If you don't speak to your cat about 'nip...

Who will? 

This is your cat.

This is your cat on catnip.

Any questions?

Yes, that's the cat I call MommyCat, who is the source of all the kittens I keep feeding, sheltering, and trying (and failing) to save. She almost always looks grouchy, but not when she's relaxing in her catnip patch.

-

Kitten rescue fund

Relationship rules- State level

Our Relationship Rules:

• You will not trade with others unless you pay me for my permission first, or you'll get locked in a cage. For some things, like alcohol and guns, you'll have to beg and pay me twice. (Because I don't like you having access to them, but I'm afraid you might throw me out if I flat out deny them to you.) And getting my permission means you'll let me nose through all your papers and harass your customers anytime I feel like it. You'll thank me for it.
  
  
• You aren't allowed to hire any help unless you pay them what I say. Or I'll destroy your livelihood and lock you in a cage
  
  
• Your car belongs to me, as demonstrated by the plate I'll force you to rent and affix to it, and you can only use it as long as I say you can.
  
  
• You won't travel faster in your car than some arbitrary speed I've decided on, or I'll stop, molest, and rob you. I might decide to lock you in a cage or kill you if I get scared. The same goes for wearing a seat belt.
  
  
• You must at all times carry the identification card I'll rent you, and you will not use your vehicle without it.
  
  
• You have to insure your car to my standards, and carry proof that you've done so, through those I've made arrangements with, or I'll take it from you. With violence if you resist.
  
  
• Your house and land will remain my property forever, which you can keep using only as long as you pay a yearly ransom. Your money is also mine, for you to use only as long as you continue to hand a percentage of it to me.
  
  
• You will hand your children over to my employees to be indoctrinated into believing I am good and necessary for survival. You will, of course, have to pay an excessive fee for this "service" or I'll take your property to sell to someone more compliant. I may also take "your" children and give them to someone else to raise. You must pretend I am educating the children.
  
  
• If I don't feel like others have strict enough rules against you owning, carrying, and using weapons of defense, I'll impose my own additional rules. You'll only defend yourself from others with my permission, which you'll never quite be sure of having. And, if you do, I'll steal your weapon and lock you in a cage, only letting you out if you can prove you didn't really mean it. 
  
  
• You are never allowed to use weapons against me, no matter how abusive or threatening you believe I have become. Or I will kill you or lock you in a cage.
  
  
• Certain plants can only be grown, sold, or consumed if I say so, and if I can find a way to get you to pay me. Otherwise, I'll lock you in a cage.
  
  
• You can only play games using money as a way of keeping score if I say so. And if I'm getting a piece of the action, obviously.
  
  
• I can make up any new rule at any time. I'll decide which rules I will enforce, and when.
  
  
• If you cross some imaginary line, any or all of these rules may change because you're now in a relationship with someone else.
  
  

This is kind of a joke, and kind of not.

I still like the format of the other list better.

There's a lot of overlap between the state's relationship rules and the federal rules. Some of the above could be added to the federal rules- and probably should be.

Here are the local rules.

-

Thank you for reading.
Tips are nice.

"Let me see your governing permit"

Any time someone tries to govern me, I feel like asking to see their governing permit. Of course, they can't because they don't have one.

"Do you have a permit to govern? Have you paid me all the required fees? If not, you're in violation."

Their "job" isn't evidence of a permit, or that they don't need one. A v*te or a "law" doesn't confer the required permission.

If they foolishly tried to use the Constitution, I'd point out that whatever they are trying to do isn't listed there, and thus, they don't have a permit for that. If hunting licenses were in any way legitimate, and they aren't, it would be like showing me a duck stamp to justify hunting bear.

I think a governing permit would require an annual renewal fee of twice the cost, to me, of the governing, including a fee for bureaucratic inconvenience and wasted time. 

Such a permit could be revoked at any time due to the appearance of abuse or the permit holder's attitude, with no refund of permit fees. Upon revocation, all tools of governance must be surrendered to me, to be disposed of as I see fit. Guns, badges, bank accounts, vehicles, offices, records/computers, phones... all handed over immediately. If they refuse to comply, the violators are declaring themselves domestic terrorists.

In reality, this is much too charitable.

But, of course, there can never be any such thing as a permit for something no one has any right to do, and no way to require a permit for things that are a natural human right.

-

Thank you for reading.
Tips are nice.

You don't want to be government's pet

(My Eastern New Mexico News column for November 5, 2025)

The SNAP crisis has shown a flaw in encouraging people to become dependent on government for anything essential. If you allow yourself to become dependent on government, it will own you.

Why would you do this to yourself? To your family?

This isn't only about food, but about a job, your personal safety, health care, or anything else you expect government to provide. Being dependent on government- something you have no real control over, and which relies on a steady stream of stolen money- is a terrible idea.

Pure self-sufficiency is impossible, but it should remain a guiding principle. It's preferable to not be a burden on others, but to be able to help them when you can. You can't do this if you are too dependent on someone else for your basic needs.

When you're dependent, the best case is that you'll be treated like a pampered pet. You may be taken care of, but you're not in control of your life or your destiny. You may be fed what someone else wants you to eat, and you may get neutered. Literally and figuratively.

The worst case is that you'll be treated like a slave. You aren't in control of your own life, but are under the control of people who don't care what happens to you. They may feed you as long as it serves their purposes and they can use you, but they don't care what happens to you if those purposes change. You're not important to them. You're fooling yourself if you believe you are; if you believe they really care more about you than about their power over you.

If you become dependent on someone else, you've given them the power to hurt you. All they have to do is withhold whatever you've come to rely on and use your anguish as a bargaining chip. Congratulations, you are now a political pawn to be used by political criminals to get whatever they want.

If you decide to riot or steal because of the situation, you've played right into their hands by doing what they were hoping you'd do. They might have said they don't want you to do these things, but they are lying. Your disruptive behavior gives them the excuses they've been hoping for.

I don't want you to put yourself in this position. Do what you can to cut the chains of dependence.

-

Thank you for reading.
Leave a tip.

The anger correlation

I’ve often heard Leftists claim that everyone to the Right of them is only "that way" because they are full of hate and anger (or are ignorant), but in my experience, that’s just not accurate. Or, at least not exclusive to one side.

I do believe, based on a lifetime of observation, that statism of any variety makes a person visibly less happy. It may be a function of going deeper in one extreme direction; those nearer the average may be happier. The people I know who are on the Right haven't been moving further Right, and are generally happier unless someone brings up one of their bonnet bees ("immigration", for example). 

And everyone is ignorant of most of reality, even if we prefer to believe otherwise.

I know one person who is exceedingly w0ke (although she'd deny it and claim it's not about politics), and she hates everything and almost everyone. The more angry she becomes, the further Left she seems to drift, or the further Left she gets, the more angry she becomes- it's hard to tell which way it goes. 

She’s very angry at the world. She only likes movies that depict torture and gruesome murder... or Marvel superhero movies. She only likes angry, screaming "music". She has no room for other opinions on anything, and no matter what you bring up that you like, she has to tell you how much she hates it.

I've mentioned her before. I care what happens to her, but it's hard to have a conversation anymore, because she's getting more w0ke and more angry. Any conversation with her devolves into her expressing hatred toward someone or something after just a few minutes- not towards me, because I know what not to say, but it's ridiculous. I don't know if it's because she believes the world isn't going her way anymore (if it ever did), or just the stress of her job. Or if it's a result of taking herself much too seriously. She's just the most extreme example I personally know of, but there are others.

I would think she's an outlier if I weren't seeing the same thing in so many other places, from so many other people. I know another person (basically non-political) who believes anger "works" for her, and who is proud of it. Of course, there are those on the Right who obsess over the specific things that make them angry. And, I see online libertarians who wallow in anger, too. Usually, it's when they try to mix "Right" or "Left" into their libertarianism, but some genuinely seem to enjoy hating. 

What is going on here? Is there a pandemic of hate and anger? Where will this lead? It doesn't seem like it's going to turn out well.

-

Thank you for reading.
Tips are nice!

Government does NOT create rights

Claiming that rights are created by government and its “laws” is like claiming gravity is created by physics textbooks. That doesn't stop statists from making this claim. I've encountered two of them (example 1, example 2) making similar claims within the past few hours.

They really want government to be a god!

Then they'll respond that gravity exists whether textbooks exist or not. I think this is an attempt at the "rights are a human/mental construct" argument. Which, as you can see, doesn't really mean anything, since anything in the Universe (including gravity) can be dismissed as a mental construct that consciousness has created, if you really want to go that route. It changes nothing about how things work.

If they can believe government, or its legislation and documents, are the source of rights, then anything government does can be justified. And this seems to be their biggest desire: to justify something that is a violation of human rights but which aligns with their preferences. Both the Right and the Left play this game.

It can be anti-gun rules, "immigration", cospucking, censorship, prohibition, or any other Big Government policy. If rights come from government, government can change those rights on a whim, to empower itself to do whatever it wants to do. And the Constitution is obviously no barrier.

"Rights come from government" means the mafia makes the rules it decides apply to you, so who do you think those rules will favor? Same with government because government is a mafia.

If rights come from government, there are no rights. In which case, I'll still behave toward you as though there are, and if you try to govern me (which you have no right to do), I will destroy you, and your complaints will fade into the void.

-

Thank you for reading.
Hamsters is nice... I mean tips are...

Government is crime, not corruption

It's not corruption; it's government working EXACTLY as designed.

Government = crime = government = crime = government = crime = ...[infinity]

Not all crime is government crime, but all (political) government is crime- real crime: archation.
And all crime is the application of the political means (like government uses) rather than the economic means, so trying to make a meaningful difference is splitting hairs.

There;s no exception for government you like or policies you agree with. If it's a good idea, there are better (ethical) ways of doing it outside of government.

-

Thank you for reading.
Tips are nice.

Is "The Jerk" a Christmas movie?

This guy, parked on the street in front of the library during the Clovis, NM Christmas parade, is a jerk.

My little group of four tried to stand behind his vehicle (between it and another vehicle), and he said, "We're going to have a lot of people here. You can't stand here. You have to move."

We moved. It's not worth having some ignorant jerk shoot you for being where he doesn't want you to be, but he is a jerk.

We (and he) were on the crowded street. In a public place, Not on his property. We were not going to crowd him more than anyone else. We were no threat to him. But he decided to be a jerk. I noticed later that he didn't have any more (or fewer) people there than any other spot, plus it looked like the jerk had given up trying to assert his counterfeit property rights over the side of Main Street.

And here we are.

UPDATE:

Apparently, other people encountered this jerk as well, including a 14-year-old male he shoved out of the way. I've seen several reports from others who were there. Eventually, he's going to confront or shove the wrong person, and then be shocked at the consequences he reaps.

Relationship rules

I originally got this idea from the LP of Louisiana, and then I modified it a little. 

I used to print it out, fold it up, give it a little pocket wear and tear, and then casually drop it in public places. I don't know if anyone ever picked a copy up and read it, or what effect it had if they did. But I found it funny to think about. Maybe I'll start doing that again. Anyway, here's the note...

Our Relationship Rules: 

* You will not make money without telling me. 

* If you trade, you can only do so with my permission. 

* You will not own anything I don't approve of, or I'll lock you in a cage. 
* You will pay me a large percentage of your income, or get locked in a cage.

* If you do not pay me whatever I demand, you will get locked in a cage. 

* I will take your money as I see fit and spend it as I want. My friends will get a cut. 

* You will not leave my property without my permission. 

* If you attempt to leave my property after getting my permission, I will grope you while bystanders watch before I decide if I'll allow you to go. 

* If you want friends to come over from another place, they must get my permission first. I will grope them. If they are someone I don't approve of, I may put them in the cage or send them back home without letting them see you. 

* You will let me listen in on your phone calls, texts, emails, or any other communications. You will let me bug your computer and watch you and listen to you through its camera and microphone, even if you're not using it. 

* I will monitor your every movement by tracking your cell phone. 

* I will ask you to publicly show your approval of me from time to time. If you don't, my friends will visit you at home and confront you in public, demanding you make this show of loyalty. If you don't do so to my satisfaction, I may put you in the cage.

* If you try to defend yourself from my henchmen, they will kill you- or put you in the cage if you survive.

* If you resist being locked in the cage, I will kill you.

* I will change these rules in my favor whenever I feel like it, and there's nothing you can do but beg me not to. 

* If you complain about any of the above, it's a sign you don't love me, and I may lock you in the cage to teach you to respect me. 

Your loving companion,
The Federal Government of the United States of America

Here are the state-level rules and the local rules.

-

Thank you for reading.
Toss a few million dollars my way- I won't tell.

Using the wrong tool for the job

Nothing is solved with a stricter government response. 

At best, the problem just gets shifted sideways. A new problem is created that distracts from the old problem, without making the old problem any better. This gives pro-government extremists a new excuse to impose a government response to this problem.

Government is the wrong tool for the job of solving problems. Every time. Without exception.

Can you see why it's an endless cycle? Can you see what the only rational response is? Hint: It's not a government crackdown or a new "war on ... whatever".

-

Thank you for reading.
Tips are appreciated.

Legal orders vs Ethical orders

Statists are very concerned about whether orders are "legal". They are somewhat less concerned about whether orders are ethical (or "lawful" in the historic sense).

I don't care a whit whether orders are legal. I only care whether they are ethical.

Many great evils are legal. 

If you follow legal orders, you're as likely to be committing wrong as right.
If you follow only ethical orders, you may be in legal trouble, but you're not the bad guy in the dispute.

Political criminals write legislation (which they'll call "laws"), making evil "legal", and then give orders to their minions based on those evil rules. That doesn't make the orders right, nor does it make following those orders ethical. It means if you follow those orders, you're committing evil alongside those who wrote the legislation and those who gave the orders. They are the bad guys and you are assiting them in doing wrong.

Don't do that, regardless of where your political loyalties lie. That's a doomed path.

-

Thank you for reading.
Help me stack Sats.

This isn't way things have to be

(My Eastern New Mexico News column for October 29, 2025)

I've discovered that telling people what kind of world you want to live in doesn't get through to anyone. It's not enough to describe a world where everyone is free to live in liberty without waiting for permission from sociopaths who imagine they have the right to run your life. This doesn't resonate.

Perhaps it would be better to describe the world I don't want. The world I'm not willing to tolerate.

I don’t want to live in a world where the government isn't afraid of the people. I don’t want to live in a world where police are allowed to act like the masters over a population of slaves who either comply instantly or face death. I don’t want to live in a world where politicians are able to do whatever they want and the people feel they must obey them.

I don't want to live in a world where politicians and their enforcers decide what rights we have, and how those rights can be limited, rationed, or licensed. Where we are expected to thank them for not doing worse.

I don't want to live in a weird upside-down world where governments pretend to have rights; where individuals are only allowed to have privileges as long as they don't scare or inconvenience the politicians and bureaucrats.

Unfortunately, this is the world we have been dealt.

What can be done about it?

First of all, realize this is backward. Nearly every political question has been turned on its head. It's not possible to get things more wrong. This can't be an accident. Someone has done this on purpose, and they are not on your side.

Second, don't pretend this is the way it has to be; the natural order of things. It's not. It's artificial and harmful. It makes society sick by harming individual liberty. Things can be better.

Third, know you don't have to put up with it. You have the rights, the authority, and the ethical foundation- everything they lack. Let them know you know. Tolerate them only as long as they are tolerable. Ignore them when they aren't. Defy them when they leave you no choice.

It will be costly, but not as costly as continuing to let them control and consume your life. Plus, no matter what it costs today, it will cost more tomorrow if allowed to continue. If you value liberty, this is your mission.

-

Thank you for reading.
Leave a tip.

Observing feral humans in the wild

I have a sockpuppet X account that does nothing but serve as a backup in case I get banned again. I don't follow people on it, nor do I post or comment. I just use it to observe.

What I observe has taught me some things.

First, it has taught me that no matter how bad the political Right is- and they are bad- the political Left is orders of magnitude worse.

Since I don't interact, I get a good sampling of posts and comments from all ideologies on that account; my "for you" is almost entirely Leftist posts. The Left is far and away the worst people among a nasty crowd. 

They can't talk about something important without lying. Even if I'm inclined to agree with them in principle, they ruin it by lying. They threaten anyone who dares to disagree with them. They are far more aggressive, on average, than the Right. They are ruder than the Right.

Sure, there are exceptions, and this is my subjective observation based on what I end up being fed by the mysterious algorithm.

Again, the Right are often wrong, but they generally seem to be nicer people than those on the Left- until you figure in their cop/military worship. Better adjusted, less angry, and less crazy. I kind of wish it weren't so, because I want to side with the Left when they point out ways in which the Right is wrong. And, I still do, but it feels icky when I see what kind of people they are beyond that one dimension. Sure, it sometimes feels the same way to side with the Right when they point out how wrong the Left is. Neither side seems able to see beyond their politics into what's true and right.

It's simpler if I can just see them all as statists who hate/fear liberty. Which they are. But it's also delusional to not notice the differences, subtle and overt.

It has also taught me how much of a bubble my real X account is in. I'm protected from many of the most toxic statist "opinions" by who I follow and who I choose to interact with. This makes it more enjoyable, but it gives me a false sense of the world. Just a quick visit to the silent account breaks the illusion.

-

Thank you for reading.
Toss a pile of doubloons my way.

Who is the problem?

 

Jews are not the problem. 

“Blacks” are not the problem.

“Immigrants” are not the problem.

"White" men are not the problem.

Landlords are not the problem.

People who choose to violate life, liberty, and property are the problem, no matter what category one might place them in.

If anyone chooses to continue to be a part of any group that is based on violating others, as a condition of belonging, even if they don’t personally participate, they are the problem. This could be a career, a religion, or a culture.

If someone is trying to make someone else the problem, based on something besides individual behavior, they are not helping. They are making the problem worse by causing a distraction.

-

Thank you for reading.
Toss a few million dollars my way- I won't tell.

The symptoms cluster and lead to a diagnosis

People who believe Americans own "too many guns" are usually the same people who believe the Covid lockdowns "saved millions of lives". It isn't a coincidence.

You really can't communicate with people that stupid (or brainwashed). The best you can accomplish is to point it out to observers.

And, isn't it strange how these beliefs cluster together? You already know which other baseless beliefs such a person is highly likely to hold. They are all symptoms of a political disease: Leftism.

The political disease of Rightism has its own cluster of symptoms; you know what they are. 

Of course, one lone symptom isn't enough for a diagnosis, but if you get two or more, you can extrapolate to know what the problem is with stunning accuracy. It works nearly every time.

On the other hand, maybe the Rightism and Leftism are only symptoms of the disease of Statism; each with its own cluster of sub-symptoms.

Self-responsibility is the cure, but it looks unappealing to the chronically ill sufferers who would benefit the most from a big dose.

-

Thank you for reading.
Toss a few cents my way.

Statism is a tragedy

Many of the events that attract media attention are simply gang warfare, gang vs. gang, and since I belong to neither gang, I don't really care. None of them are "our" teammates.

I don't want innocent people hurt or killed or otherwise violated, but innocent people don't violate life, liberty, or property (fundamental human rights). Many times, I don't see an innocent person where others seem to. 

Often it's a matter of consequences: Do certain things, and you increase the likelihood of certain bad outcomes. Crying about it afterward doesn't change anything. If you don't like getting zapped, don't stick your tongue in a light socket.

I wish the gangs would keep it between themselves and leave the rest of us alone. But they can't seem to do that. They will lie and claim to be on my side, but I know it's a lie. This is why I can't get too involved in the drama surrounding some of these events that I'm told are VERY IMPORTANT for me to get worked up over.

Statism is a tragedy. It would be weird if it didn't lead to more tragedy every time it is applied.

-

Thank you for reading.
Toss breadcrumbs to me.

Magic (tariff) Money

Sending out another round of stimulus checks, even if you call it a tariff windfall or something like that, would be incredibly irresponsible and economically ignorant. So... par for the course.

Just as I warned people back before the pandemic stimulus that it would cause inflation and make everything more expensive, I’ve tried to warn people this time.

They still don’t listen. They still don’t care. All they hear is “Free money!”

But TANSTAAFL.

At this point, I say send the money. Send some every month. Every week! Drive right off the cliff.

Sometimes you’ve got to stand aside and let people get what they want. Good and hard. No matter what the consequences. Yes, it will be another blow to the economy. At this point, does it matter?

Just do what you have to do to protect yourself. If you can find a niche to profit from the collapse, go for it.

For me, I think I’m done spending Bitcoin. I’ve done my part in working to make it spendable money. I think I’m going to HODL from now on. I was just about to spend $400 or so before the recent crash. I decided to wait until the price went back up, but I’m not inclined to spend any now. The economy looks too precarious at the moment. Maybe if things improve in a few years, I will reconsider.

And, if the checks do come, don't waste it. Get stuff that's going to help you through what's coming. Preps. Metals. Bitcoin. Guns and ammo. You won't regret it.

-

Thank you for reading.
It's Blech Friday.

Happy Thanksgiving!

Happy Thanksgiving!

I am forever thankful for YOU! And to you!

I asked Grok to draw a traditional Thanksgiving meal. (Specifically, I wrote: Show a traditional Thanksgiving meal, with a roasted turkey as the centerpiece.) I got the nice picture above. 

Then, to be funny, I asked it to give the turkey four legs. That was a nightmare-inducing mistake. The results reminded me of something out of Kurt Russell's The Thing.  It was downright Lovecraftian!
Horrors incomprehensible to the human mind. Perhaps suited for the most terrifying Halloween meal, but not for Thanksgiving. I stopped before something worse happened. You're welcome to try it yourself and see what Grok serves you.

Be Thankful I spared you from seeing that! You're welcome.

It's true: Democracy is mob rule

(My Eastern New Mexico News column for October 22, 2025)

There is no such thing as a "right to vote".

This may be shocking, but it's true. No one has the right to impose politicians or policies on others; to govern them. Not by being king nor by voting.

Democracy is mob rule, even with the weak guardrails of a republic under a constitution describing which lines are never to be crossed, no matter how many voters approve. It didn't work; legislation violating the limits laid out by the Constitution is routinely imposed and upheld. None of the responsible lawmakers or legislation enforcers ever face repercussions for these illegal acts.

Might through superior numbers can't turn wrong into "right". Alternative ways of governing others are no better, in case you misunderstand my point.

The only legitimate use of a vote is as a privilege of club membership, not as a right. Those who aren't in the club don't get to vote on club matters. Further, the results of a vote can't be binding on those who didn't vote or on those on the losing side; only on those who voted in favor of the particular question.

If you vote for a tax, you bear the expense. Those who didn't vote for it don't pay it, nor do they get the privilege of using the product or service that the tax funds. For something like garbage collection or a water utility, providers can charge a user fee or allow people to opt out or find their own alternative. It's unethical to force others to go along just because you outnumber them.

For something you believe will benefit those who vote against it without them contributing, take this into consideration before voting. Maybe you can make your argument and persuade them to join you. Or if this fails, maybe you'll change your vote in this case, as is your right.

To argue in favor of a near-universal right to vote just because people live in a particular place is like saying I have the right to tell a church in my neighborhood how it will operate and spend money. Just because of where I live, whether I choose to join it or not. I am not that arrogant or entitled.

There's no "right to vote", but neither is there an obligation to abide by a vote which goes against your rights or preferences, nor a right to use something you aren't willing to pay for.

-

Thank you for reading.
Leave a tip.

The War Between the Statists

The War Between the Statists is heating up. 

Do you see it, too?

They don't realize how much alike they are. Statism is statism, and it's all socialism/fascism. It's all authoritarianism. But they are at each other's throats over the minor details. They want this variety and not that one. They want this loophole of liberty closed, and their opponents want that other loophole of liberty shut down. Working together, they try to crush any possibility of liberty.

I admit I occasionally do things just to aggravate them if they are being particularly nasty in their statist advocacy.

But, you don't have to intentionally poke them to make them go crazy after "the other side", although it can be amusing. It's like watching one of those cat videos where a cat baps another cat on the head, but the victim flips out on a third cat who was minding his own business. That's statists for you.

Stay safe as they go after each other. Stupid people can be a danger to those around them.

-

Thank you for reading.
Toss a few cents my way.