Cops- reavers- don't protect you from bad guys. Their true purpose is to protect the "law" from you and me. To keep the "law" from being broken. Liberty breaks "laws".
No one obeys most "laws" anymore because the "law" is right; they obey (when they do) to keep from being killed. The ones primarily doing the killing are those enforcing the "law": the reavers.
That makes them my enemy.
You are in no real danger from most "lawbreakers"- you are one yourself whether you accept it or not. The danger is from the "law" and those enforcing it.
The guy smoking pot is no threat to me and is not my enemy. The armed thugs enforcing the anti-marijuana "laws" are a threat and are my enemy, even if I have never smoked pot in my life.
The guy who crossed some imaginary line on a map is not a threat to me and is not my enemy. The armed thugs enforcing "border control" are a threat and are my enemy, even if I was born in America and have never crossed a border.
The guy building machine guns in his garage is no threat to me and is not my enemy. The armed thugs enforcing the anti-gun "laws" are a threat and are my enemy, even if I have never touched a gun in my life.
Those who work to protect "laws" from the liberty of my fellow human beings are the threat and are the enemy, and I will NEVER forget it.
.
Wednesday, October 03, 2012
In Defense of Violence
The Zero Aggression Principle states: "No human being has the right, under ANY circumstances, to initiate force against another human being, nor to advocate or delegate its initiation".
"Initiate", as in "start it". That's what "aggression" is. Even very young children recognize the clear difference. "He started it" is often the cry for justice from their lips.
Violence when used in self defense is not the same as violence used to harm an innocent person. Initiated force (offensive violence / aggression) is wrong; reactive force (defensive violence) is just and good. A moral individual will recognize the difference even while governments refuse to. This is one reason (out of many) the D.A.R.E. program is so evil; in its blanket condemnation of all violence, it does not differentiate initiated force from self defensive violence. That is because the authoriturds believe that only they can properly use violence- against the rest of us.
The blind rejection of self defensive violence has left our society crippled with crime and government. Evil individuals and governments will never learn to behave themselves if there are no painful or fatal consequences for their offenses. The predators among us need to be reintroduced to fear. Violence in the form of self defense must be encouraged and rewarded, and people whom governments demonize for using self defense must be supported by all lovers of liberty.
(From my archives. Originally published April 12, 2007. Updated.)
.
"Initiate", as in "start it". That's what "aggression" is. Even very young children recognize the clear difference. "He started it" is often the cry for justice from their lips.
Violence when used in self defense is not the same as violence used to harm an innocent person. Initiated force (offensive violence / aggression) is wrong; reactive force (defensive violence) is just and good. A moral individual will recognize the difference even while governments refuse to. This is one reason (out of many) the D.A.R.E. program is so evil; in its blanket condemnation of all violence, it does not differentiate initiated force from self defensive violence. That is because the authoriturds believe that only they can properly use violence- against the rest of us.
The blind rejection of self defensive violence has left our society crippled with crime and government. Evil individuals and governments will never learn to behave themselves if there are no painful or fatal consequences for their offenses. The predators among us need to be reintroduced to fear. Violence in the form of self defense must be encouraged and rewarded, and people whom governments demonize for using self defense must be supported by all lovers of liberty.
(From my archives. Originally published April 12, 2007. Updated.)
.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)