"Expanding gun rights"?

In many online comments, you'll see anti-gun bigots whine that the Supreme Courtjesters have recently been "expanding gun rights".

This is simply a lie. These people expose their ignorance about what rights are.

Getting the criminal government out of the illegal business of rationing and controlling guns and gun owners is not “expanding gun rights”, it’s respecting rights that have been routinely violated.

The Supremes won't even go all the way into forcing government back into the box it is required to stay in. If they did, they'd rule that every gun "law", from top to bottom, is immediately null and void. You could go online today and order a full-auto AK-47 direct from Russia, to be delivered to your house.

If the Court decided that you were allowed to shoot anyone who annoyed you, that would be illegitimately "expanding" gun rights-- you can't have a right to violate others' life, liberty, or property. Anti-gun bigots who generally believe in this kind of imaginary "right" would really shriek if "gun rights" got expanded the same way they want other "rights" dreamed up and expanded. 

But, telling government it has no "authority" to stand in your way of owning and carrying any sort of weapon you choose, openly or concealed, everywhere you go, without asking government permission, doesn't "expand" anything. It just limits the violations that have been occurring for at least the past 90 years,

-

Thank you for reading.
I need your support.

Don't be a tool

Some of the worst tools of authoritarianism are people who asked and paid the state for a license or a permit to do something they already have a natural human right to do. 

Some of these people don’t want to see others living their liberty.

Whenever someone turns a fellow human in to the enforcers, it's usually one of these people.

I would never do this to someone. I'm completely supportive of anyone doing something they have a right to do without having jumped through the "legal" hoops. Even if they are doing something I got a license to do. Any license I've ever had made me feel bad about myself. It makes me feel good to see people who skipped the license.

How about you?

-

Thank you for reading.
I need your support.

Why AI will be limited

Grok, the AI from X, can now read and summarize bills so political criminals can't hide what's in them. They can't claim "We have to pass it to find out what's in it" anymore.

Musk says they are also adding all court cases to Grok's training set so that it can render verdicts.

Do the Constitution next.

Program an AI with the text of the US Constitution and, as long as no one puts a finger on the scales to tip it in favor of government power, it would expose the criminality of 99.999% of the federal government. (The rest is also unethical, but that's the fatal flaw of the Constitution.) It could bring down the State-- which it will not be allowed to do. 

Either AI will never be trained on the text, history, and tradition of the Constitution, or someone will have to put a lot of fingers on the scales to make sure that AI can't understand what was written there. 

AI will be used against you, but not against the State. Unless you do that part yourself.

-

Thank you for reading.
I need your support.

Election season scary time of year

(My Eastern New Mexico News column for October 27, 2024)

We're entering the magical time of year. For the next few months, living in a fantasy is socially acceptable.

The strangest season is when monsters lurk in every shadow, free handouts are available for the asking, and everyone gets to pretend to be something they're not. Yes, it's election season.

It would be nice if people got only the politicians they voted for. Those who refrain from the ritual wouldn't get saddled with a politician at all. This change might reduce the number of voters to a reasonable level; something government wouldn't want to let happen. They need you to go along with the charade. It usually keeps the peasants from revolting.

The problem is less the specific politician in the office, and more the existence of the office itself, and the institution the office is a part of. The president may be the least important factor.

Changing the hood ornament on the car that's running you down is effective...at making you feel like you've accomplished something. It won't save you from being run over, but at least you can feel good about what ran you down. Or, this is how it looks to me.

Every election since I've been an adult has been "The most important election in our lifetime". I'm not even saying this is a lie, but it is a sign— a sign we've allowed presidents to become too important.

If a presidential election can destroy or save America, presidents have too much power, and this means government has too much power. The way to fix this isn't to elect better presidents, it's to remove the power from them and from government. Permanently, not just until you get the president you want.

I know you probably believe government is necessary. You've seen how badly people behave themselves and how they avoid doing the right thing. You'll get no argument from me, but the conclusion most people draw from this is backward. If people can't be trusted to govern their own lives-- to make smart, ethical choices-- there's no way I trust them to vote. Adding all these irresponsible voices together doesn't make them smarter or more ethical. It doesn't dilute the bad; it intensifies it.  Allowing this chorus of irresponsible people to choose a politician to impose on the rest of us is insane.

If the monsters of Halloween became real, they would be less frightening than voters.

-

Thank you for reading.
Show your support.

Military cultists

An account on X was showcasing a New Zealand military ritual, where commanders are greeted with a traditional Maori Haka dance. The context of the post seemed to be "Look at this ridiculous behavior".

I commented, "No more ridiculous than any other military ritual, like saluting or saying 'sir'."

I got a couple of insulting replies, but no actual argument about how I might be wrong. Because I'm not wrong.

Those who push back against my observation are military cultists. They can't see how ridiculous the rituals they like are; they only see the absurdity of the rituals performed by a different denomination of their cult. It's all about the brainwashing.

I'm completely outside their cult. I see all military ritual as ridiculous. The New Zealand ritual is culturally appropriate-- but still ridiculous. Saluting a "superior officer" is culturally appropriate and equally ridiculous, as is yelling "YES SIR!" to anything said by those "superior" jerks.

I understand the psychological reasons for the dumb rituals-- group cohesion, brainwashing, hierarchy, setting themselves apart from society, etc. But they are still dumb. Military cultists can't allow themselves to see it.

-

Thank you for reading.
I need your support.

The surveillance state or humanity-- your choice

The surveillance state has to be dismantled and destroyed. I'm not saying it will be, but that it has to be. If it isn't, civilization is over. 

It's a choice.

You can allow the bad guys to keep their surveillance state or you can choose civilization, society, and human flourishing.

The surveillance state includes all "tax" records, all gun records, all license records-- anything that can be used to track and categorize people, and to govern them (steal their life, liberty, and property). It ALL must be ground into dust and burned.

It all has to be gone. Or else.

-

Thank you for reading.
I need your support.

Gratitude Day

Enjoy your Thanksgiving!

-

Thank you for reading.
Are you thankful for what I do?

They want to be the center of its attention

I saw an ad on YouTube where a guy with "crazy eyes" was appealing to people who feel like government has neglected them.

WHAT?!

Have you ever felt neglected by government? That would be a dream come true for some of us. Me included. I can't think of anything better than being neglected-- ignored-- by the world's largest and most dangerous criminal gang.

Instead, I feel molested, annoyed, robbed, and watched by government. Government gets in the way of me living my life. Government helps freelance criminals violate the decent people in society. And this guy feels that being neglected by these clowns would be bad?

I suppose those who feel neglected by government are living in a delusion where government is there to help them. That's not reality, but it must be what they believe to be real. Otherwise, they would be sensible and hope to avoid government notice or "help".

People like that are part of the problem.

I have no idea what he was selling. I skipped the ad as soon as possible because I knew there was nothing there for me. Slavery holds no appeal to me.

-

Thank you for reading.
I need your support.

The Trump failures stack up

The only thing I care about, politically, is guns.

Well, that's not completely true, but it's close enough. As L. Neil Smith wrote: 

The issue of guns is "an X-ray machine. It's a Vulcan mind-meld. It's the ultimate test to which any politician-- or political philosophy-- can be put. If a politician isn't perfectly comfortable with the idea of his average constituent, any man, woman, or responsible child, walking into a hardware store and paying cash -- for any rifle, shotgun, handgun, machinegun, anything -- without producing ID or signing a scrap of paper, he isn't your friend no matter what he tells you."

That is The Truth.

Trump hasn't yet taken office and is already failing the test. He's nominating anti-gun bigots to his administration. I'm neither shocked nor disappointed. Business as usual.

A patriotic blogger thought Trump's anti-gun Attorney General nominee, Pam Bondi, was a great choice. I commented that everyone who seemed to know about her called her a disaster on the Second Amendment. He replied, in part: 

...It is fair to say that she has defended State laws that do impose some restrictions on gun ownership. However, I think most of us agree that some restrictions are applicable...

Then "most" of you are wrong, just like when "most" people believed slavery was natural and necessary. No restrictions on purchasing, owning, or carrying firearms are "applicable". None of them are legal, ethical, or right.

If someone respects the right to own and to carry weapons, then other rights are probably safe from them. If that right is violated ("restricted"), then all rights are in danger. Even if you believe "some restrictions are applicable".

No one violates your right to own and to carry weapons for your benefit. They do so in order to do things to you that you would not tolerate if you were able to effectively refuse. It's as true for Trump as it would have been for Harris. Authoritarians do what authoritarians do.

Trump could partially reduce the damage by putting Brandon Hererra in charge of the ATF, to dismantle it and destroy its records. I'm not holding my breath. He seems to like the statist quo.

-

Thank you for reading.
I need your support.

"Deny my existence"

Recently I've seen a lot of posts proclaiming that this or that person (or group) "denies my existence". It has never been true in any example given or any situation described.

No one denies anyone's existence. If anyone did deny someone's existence, they would crash into and run over the person they deny exists, since that which doesn't exist would be invisible. You can't see what doesn't exist, and if you do see something that doesn't exist, that's called "hallucinating".

This is a weird new lie told to manipulate.

It's usually said by people who believe they are the opposite sex (which they have the right to do) and who want everyone to play along (which they have no right to force others to do), but I can use a different example to illustrate the absurdity.

I don't deny that government employees exist. I recognize they are not what they claim to be: they are the bad guys, not the good guys. My recognition of reality doesn't mean they don't exist. They obviously do. I'm not denying their existence. I don't fall for their dishonest narrative. They can believe whatever they want to believe; their belief doesn't change reality. Not even if they use threats and aggression to get others to play along.

-

Thank you for reading.
I need your support.

World dying from cancer of states

(My Eastern New Mexico News column for October 20, 2024)

I don't support Israel. I don't support Palestine. I don't support Ukraine, Russia, or any other state. I support individuals who live in places claimed by those states, as long as they aren't violating the life, liberty, or property of others.

States-- political governments-- are a threat to every life on the planet. If life on Earth is wiped out, and it isn’t due to an asteroid or a gamma-ray burst, it will be because of states doing what states do. It is preventable. Few have any interest in preventing it.

Most people want to cheer for a team. They call for unity but crave division and conflict. They like the drama which comes from national and international politics. They believe one side is good and the other is bad. They are wrong. All states are bad. They are grounded in the belief that a right to govern others exists. States survive on the superstition that doing wrong isn’t wrong if it's done by people claiming the imaginary authority of a government.

Some people claim states are a necessary evil. Evil is never necessary; it’s a choice. The wrong choice.

When people invade, attack, destroy, kidnap, or murder because the state tells them to, they are the bad guys. Even if someone else, acting on behalf of an opposing state, did the same to them last year. Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again, expecting different results. States drive people insane, causing them to do insanely evil things, expecting this will make the world better. It never does; it never will. Politics makes people stupid and encourages them to do evil.

In the moment, in any conflict between individuals acting on behalf of governments, someone is more wrong. It's the one doing the invading, attacking, destroying, kidnapping, and murdering. Sixty seconds from now, it could be the other side which is more wrong.

A one-world government is not the answer. It would only be a bigger, all-encompassing state. It would be just as evil, just as deadly, and even more tyrannical. Someone reading this just had the rug pulled out from under them. They thought opposing the existence of states meant I was supporting global government. They couldn't be more wrong.

Tragically, the rest of us are forced to live in a world with such stupid, pointless evil. A world dying from the cancer of states.

-

Thank you for reading.
Show your support.

Spend or save? Save or spend?

As so often happens when Bitcoin has a rally, I'm torn between spending it now while it's high, or using it as my "retirement account" and counting on it to just keep going up over the long term.

Of course, it may have dropped precipitously since I wrote the above paragraph, so this may be moot. You never know.

Those of you who have/use Bitcoin, what do you do?

When I first started dabbling in Bitcoin, I generally spent about half of what I had when it had gone up a lot. I thought that if it became worthless tomorrow, I was still ahead. I don't regret doing that, since I couldn't have known the future. Although I occasionally think of what might have been... Now, I'm much more sparing when spending it.

I would be a little sad if it went to zero now and I hadn't taken advantage of it before that happened. I would still be far ahead, though.

-

Thank you for reading.
I need your support.

Hard fact

You are not safer because the US government maintains an illegal (unconstitutional) standing military.

-

Thank you for reading.
I need your support.

Types of legislation I oppose

There are three types of legislation; all are bad.

One type prohibits something.

Another encourages something harmful; something few would be inclined to do without the “law” encouraging them to do it.

The third type of legislation mandates something that would be helpful if pursued on its own but ruins it with the threat of death.

I’m opposed to all legislation, no matter which type you’re talking about. 

Even if you can think of another type I missed, I oppose it, too. My opposition is automatic.

-

Thank you for reading.
I need your support.

The magical Glass Chicken

When I was a kid we had a glass chicken on a glass nest bowl. For some reason, I thought it was magic.

I thought the chicken could "lay" coins at night. I don't remember what the deal was with that, but long after the coins stopped appearing, I still revered that chicken and felt a sort of magic surrounding it.

Just like statists feel about the state.

They think government just "lays" money. They don't realize that any money you find there had to be put there by someone else. Just like my parents put the coins under the chicken.

Government doesn't produce any money (or anything else) on its own. Everything that seems to come from it was put there by someone else; by a thief who stole someone's property to make it magically appear to come from the state.

I grew out of my belief in the magical glass chicken. Most people have yet to grow out of their belief in the state. They are living in a fantasy.

-

Thank you for reading.
I need your support.

Re-limited government

The Constitution was a mistake.

It was a mistake that still could have worked out sort of OK, had the people been able to force the government-- against its wishes and self-interest-- to obey the Constitution to the letter.

They weren't able or willing to do that back in the early 1800s when that had a possibility of working. It's far too late for that now.

At this point, it would be unthinkably radical to make the feral government get back within the limits of what it is allowed to do on even just a few of its worst offenses. The only thing that might happen is to scale back the massive abuses a tiny, useless amount. 

Don't count on even that.

And yet, those who believe they can get government back under control tell those of us who point out that political government must be abolished entirely, that our preference is impossible. They are in denial about their own preference's likelihood, but it's so much easier to point fingers and ignore reality.

I guarantee you there's a better chance of the US feral government disbanding than of anyone getting it back under control and within the limits of the Constitution. I'd love to be proven wrong, but that's simply the reality.

-

Thank you for reading.
I need your support.

If those are "civilized societies", no thank you!

I feel terrible when I see Australians and British people posting about the horrid tyranny they are now being subjected to. 

Then I remember them scolding me for not giving up my guns the way "civilized societies" such as theirs have done. 

Most of my sympathy instantly evaporates.

I want to feel sympathy, but they allowed this to happen. They demanded it in many cases. And many of them are demanding I allow it to happen to me!

No. 

I still feel sympathy for those who are smart enough to know this was a bad idea, and who want to change things but are vastly outgunned now. The ones who say "Never give up your guns!" I wish I could help them. 

About all I can do is to continue pointing out the truth: Disarmed people are slaves. Government is your Ancestral Enemy and doesn't care if you die. It just wants you to be quiet and obedient and keep allowing it to steal your property and violate your rights.

No one ever wants you disarmed for your benefit.

-

Thank you for reading.
May I request your support?

FEMA getting in way of helpers

(My Eastern New Mexico News column for October 13, 2024)

The situation with Hurricane Helene was terrible, but thanks to government— specifically FEMA, the Federal Emergency Management Administration— it ended up being much worse than anyone could have expected. As I write this, Hurricane Milton, which looks potentially even more dangerous, has set its sights on central Florida. Will FEMA bungle or sabotage the response to this one, too?

I accept it as a given that government doesn't help, but at a minimum, it shouldn't get in the way or make things worse.

Even this is too much to ask.

FEMA blocking private rescuers from helping the victims was wrong. I'd call it evil. This decision probably killed people. Yes, I understand the agents of FEMA don't want to let people risk their lives, but this is what people choose to do. People heroically risk their lives for others all the time. No one should be stopping them. Government has no say in the matter. It's also not for them to decide whether the offered help is the correct kind or going to the right places or people. If government can't help, it must stand aside and let the people handle it.

To threaten these awe-inspiring volunteers with arrest— whether they were arrested or not— is the last straw.

Many people who still believe government is legitimate call for it to have a monopoly on violence— for government to be the only entity legally allowed to use force. This is both ridiculous and dangerous. However, the apparent "monopoly of assistance" claimed by FEMA after Hurricane Helene is just as bad. It's unforgivable.

Will the federal government now make and enforce new legislation forbidding private assistance after a disaster? Don’t put it past them. The private response embarrassed them and exposed their incompetence. They don't like this. They may want to make sure they have more tools to use in the next disaster— not tools to help, but tools to hurt. Tools to use against the American people, like the grossly misnamed “PATRIOT ACT”.

I would abolish FEMA for this. Of course, there would be no government agencies left if I had my way. They are unneeded. Everything government does shows this to be more true with each passing day.

No matter how much you detest government, you don't hate it enough. This will change if you keep paying attention... unless you have a blind spot that prevents you from accepting reality.

-

Thank you for reading.
Show your support.

Post-election hilarity

Soon, I'll probably be spending more time online poking holes in the statist delusions of "conservatives" and laughing at them, but as of now, I'm having so much fun laughing at the hysterical "left".

They are flouncing off to other countries. OK. Have fun.

They are flouncing off of X. (And making a point to call it Twitter to hurt Musk's feelings. I'd be surprised if it bothers him any.)

They are having meltdowns over Trump's cabinet picks. The picks are all horrible statists (who else would be in a position to get appointed to a government post?), but I love watching the meltdowns. And the mischaracterizations ("RFK jr. is an anti-vaxxer!").

They can't accept that it doesn't make someone "far-right" to notice how crazy the "left" has become. They've moved so far to the left (if the Earth were flat, they would have fallen off the western edge years ago) that the middle is now "far-right" to them. And being shoved away to make enemies of them. They have zero self-awareness; they are oblivious. They are bewildered, and they are angry (at what they've done to themselves). But they continue to blame everyone else. It's kinda what statists do.

They are shaving their heads and trying to be ugly so "conservative" men won't be interested in them. Were they interested in them before?

They are also "threatening" to not have sex with any men for 4 years. Again, I ask whether this will affect anyone they intend to hurt.

They are bragging about the number of abortions they have had, and promising to have lots more. Just to punish men.

Then, most pathetically of all, when I point out any of their craziness they think they can get my goat by telling me things about Trump I already know and don't support. Swing, and a miss. Not a Trump supporter, but Harris? Seriously? LOL!

I find it comedic, but I probably have a warped sense of humor.

-

Thank you for reading.
May I request your support?

Highly skeptical- slightly hopeful

I'm skeptical of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). Government inefficiency is where liberty survives.

I also know it will have no actual power to do anything beyond making recommendations.

But, if it somehow decides "efficiency" means "less money spent on government", if the recommendations are embraced, if this means government agencies are gutted or eliminated, and if the savings result in less taxation and more liberty, then it will have been a benefit. 

That's a lot of "if". I'm skeptical but I would love to be wrong. There's no way it can disappoint me since I have no expectations.

At least Musk and Ramaswamy are not being paid. That's a start. No one should be paid for working for government.

If invited, I would take an unpaid position as head of the ATF or IRS (working remotely, because I'm not going to the District of Criminals) to make them more "efficient". It would take me an afternoon at most. If not me, then Brandon Herrera would be a good pick to head the ATF. I think he'd do that mostly right.

-

Thank you for reading.
May I request your support?

Would this be Black/Gold pilled?

I'm an anarchist. I don't need government to force me to respect your rights with its "laws". 

I don't need government to define "rights", either. Government invariably gets definitions wrong.

The only thing I need for government to do is to keep its filthy paws off my life. And that's the one thing it is utterly incapable of and unwilling to do.

So... 

I don't want government to be more efficient. I want it to fail and implode because of its own poor design. 

I don't want "better" people in government. I want people to be fundamentally better enough that they know working for government in any capacity is always the wrong thing to do.

The arguments about how rough the transition would be don't move me anymore. Statists have had plenty of chances and warning. They keep choosing this-- many don't realize it's a choice and they never will. It's going to hurt less if it happens today than if the collapse holds off another ten years. The sooner, the better.

-

Thank you for reading.
May I request your support?

Are YOU willing?

A couple of days ago I posted that I'm not in favor of making anything illegal. I'm sure someone out there thought "but what about...?"

Are there things I think should be addressed? Of course. Archation of any sort shouldn't be allowed to stand. But how far are you willing to go in any case that isn't immediate self-defense? And do you think I should be forced to go just as far, or stop where you would stop?

If you aren't willing, personally, to kill someone for doing something you don't like them doing (and ALL "laws" are enforced with death), then why would you be willing to send others to kill someone, on your behalf, for the same offense?

If you are willing to hire a death squad, why should I be robbed to pay someone to kill people for you when I'm not willing? And are you willing to kill me for refusing to help you pay for your death squad?

Here's a personal example: I oppose abortions of convenience. I wouldn't be willing to kill a woman for seeking or going through with an abortion, nor a doctor to stop him from performing an abortion. So I oppose "laws" banning abortion. 

I would be willing to shun someone for doing something I consider wrong, whether it's collecting "taxes", kidnapping drug users, or killing someone's pet squirrel. Statists are willing to kill the victims of all those crimes.

Don't be like the statists.

-

Thank you for reading.
May I request your support?

Government of the what?

The reality of government is so different from the lie Lincoln told.

In reality, what exists is Government of the evil, by the idiots, for the cowards.

And that's the best form of government, according to many. Sounds like a superstition to me.

-

Thank you for reading.
May I request your support?

Don't make that illegal

I am not in favor of acts being made illegal. None of them, without exception. This doesn't mean I'm in favor of criminals running roughshod over individuals. Nothing could be further from the truth.

What I am in favor of is no one getting in the way of people using force-- defensive violence-- to stop violators from violating them or others. 

That means getting rid of "laws", not adding to them. Abolish any rules that make defense a "crime". Getting rid of legislation is always the way to do the right thing. Adding legislation is always wrong; it's never helpful.

If you are violating someone's life, liberty, or property they have the natural human right to stop you. Whatever it takes. No matter if you think you have the "right" (or "authority") to do what you are doing. If they have to end your life to stop you, that's on you. 

Don't like it, don't violate people. Simple enough?

-

Thank you for reading.
May I request your support?

Look to neighbors, not government

(My Eastern New Mexico News column for October 6, 2024)

My sympathy goes out to everyone affected by Hurricane Helene and its aftermath. It's easy for those of us who live far from the ocean, or any water whatsoever, to feel smug for living where hurricanes don't reach. If this is how you feel, remember it's a false sense of security.

Every area has its own problems and potential disasters. Tornadoes, wildfires, blizzards, riots, or earthquakes... and sometimes a smorgasbord of all the above. Figure out your region's most likely disaster and prepare for it. And the others as well. Even preparing for the trouble a hurricane can cause in an area like this, where hurricanes are as likely as elephant stampedes, will carry over to other problems you may experience. So many precautions are the same no matter the emergency.

The worst mistake is to fail to prepare because you believe government will ride in like a hero to kiss your scrapes and bruises and make your boo-boos all better. If they show up at all, they may make things worse.

FEMA, the Federal Emergency Management Agency-- the one agency you might believe would have, as their top priority, helping people recover from disasters-- has said equity is their "Goal 1". Not disaster response, rescue, or recovery, but the antisocial communist ideology of equity. That's disgusting and an utter failure on their part.

Even before FEMA got infected with this mind virus, they were less helpful than locals could be. Neighbors helping neighbors is the foundation of society. Don't try to replace society with government. It won't work.

Government was never going to save you. You’ve always been on your own. If you’ve been planning on government help, make other plans. Government is your enemy, not your savior. Grow up and accept your responsibility.

This doesn't mean you shouldn't accept help from government, or anyone else, should it be offered. Go ahead. Don't be counting on it, though. Don't wait for help which isn't coming.

Instead, help your neighbors when they need it, even in minor troubles. Ask for help when you need it. Build community. We have each other, and relying on government erodes community. Government needs us, we don't need it. If we think we don't need to lift a finger because that's government's job, we are missing a great opportunity and empowering something harmful.

There's a better way, and now you know what it is. But you already knew, didn't you?

-

Thank you for reading.
Show your support.

Do you want to be protected from liberty?

All of the politicians promising to protect "their" state from whatever they imagine Trump will do would be impressive... if they weren't embracing the wrong things in most cases. "Protecting" the population really just means they want to keep violating them in the traditional ways they've been getting away with up until now.

They say they'll protect their population from anyone trying to "take their freedom" while they've been doing nothing other than violating the freedom-- and the liberty-- of those in the state since the day they took office.

"Hypocrite" isn't a strong enough word to describe these political criminals.

It seems some of them are scared that they'll finally be forced to obey the Second Amendment. They see the end of their anti-gun schemes. 

There's really no risk that will happen. Trump isn't going to force anyone to obey the Second Amendment- he may try to stop them from breaking the law in specific ways, but no powerful politician (or Supreme Courtjester) has ever figured out what the Bill of Rights was for or what it does. Trump has never been a friend of gun owners- he just isn't as bad as Harris probably would have been. That's a very low bar, though.

"Protecting" your population from liberty is what slave owners do. It's not good, kind, or "progressive". It's evil. 

-

Thank you for reading.
May I request your support?

Onward

What a thrilling selection.

Now I can spend the next four or more years criticizing the stupid, evil, authoritarian things the Republicans do. Some of which will be the same stupid, evil, authoritarian things the Democrats do, while some will be exciting new evils.

It would be nice if this weren’t necessary, but that’s not the world we inhabit. Yet.

-

Thank you for reading.
May I request your support?

The nicest thing to do for those doing wrong

The nicest-- most useful-- thing you can do about someone who is doing bad things is to make them feel bad about what they're doing. They need to stop, and no one is helped if they aren't called out and made to feel bad about it.

If someone removes that option, the only remaining step will be much more painful.

This is a reality censors won't admit, but it is reality.

My X account got locked over the comment I shared above. I deleted it, but I wasn't wrong to say it. 

That harpy needs to have her feelings hurt or she won't learn that what she did is evil and not acceptable. It needs to be said over and over until she stops being evil. Her next victims might not be as nice. And I wouldn't shed a tear.

-

Thank you for reading.
May I request your support?

Exercise discernment about "laws"

I am convinced that the people calling others “illegals” today are the same kind of people who would have been turning in the Jews in Nazi Germany. The same kind of person who turned in the squirrel and raccoon in New York. 

All because “they are breaking the law!”

Jews were "illegals" in Germany at that time. Sure, the "laws" were counterfeit, but that made as much difference to the people back then as it makes to people who rail against "illegals" today. As much difference as it makes to the abominable excuse for a woman who turned in the "illegal" squirrel and raccoon.

A real law only protects rights. It never violates them, not even when those rights are unpopular. Or dangerous. Only political criminals propose, pass, or enforce counterfeit "laws" that violate life, liberty, or property. You have no obligation to obey them, or to tolerate them being enforced. It's your responsibility to do what's right regardless of what the "law" says.

Either you can tell when "laws" are fake, and can tell when obeying them would be wrong, or you can't. It appears most people still can't. I'm doing what I can to fix that. Could you please do your part, too?

-

Thank you for reading.
May I have your support?

Election outcomes

If you know anything about me, you know what I believe would be the best possible outcome of this election.

What about the worst possible outcome?

In the near term, I think the worst possible outcome would be Harris being made president. But, in the long-term, if her presidency caused the US feral government to collapse completely, that might eventually lead to the best possible outcome. (The same would be true about anyone else installed in the office.) It would just be painful and take a while. It would bring what is called "interesting times".

Either way, we'll get through it. We're accustomed to being on the fringe; we're the outliers. This election isn't going to change that. We'll keep prepping. We'll keep ignoring counterfeit "laws" when necessary. We'll be censored and we may be caged. We'll still be at risk, but we'll keep working to inspire a new generation of liberty outlaws. We'll persevere. 

We don't need to know who rules The State (and pretends to rule you) to know this much.

-

Thank you for reading.
May I request your support?

The Fifth of November... again

 

I'll be watching V For Vendetta again like I always do on the Fifth of November. 

It gives me hope for the future to see a fictional account of people getting fed up with the State and doing something substantive about it. Even if it's a flawed response. At least it's something more useful than v*ting.

Seriously, prepare for unrest. I think it will not happen in any widespread way. It may not even happen in the few spots it's nearly guaranteed for days or weeks- depending on how long it takes the corporate media to declare a "winner". 

It never hurts to be ready for something that never happens, but it can be deadly to not prepare for something that does happen. Making a show of not preparing, which some people like to do, isn't being smart.

-

Thank you for reading.
May I request your support?

About a squirrel?

As I previously mentioned, I am insanely angry over the death of a squirrel. But am I?

It's not just about the squirrel (and raccoon), or even the people who kept them. It's about the State and those reprehensible people who work for (and as) the State. It's about them having the illegitimate power to invade your house, steal your happy, healthy pets, and KILL them just because "rules". It's about the mega-karen who reported them to the State, setting this tragedy in motion. It's about those people out there mindlessly defending the actions of the enforcers. Imagine being so evil, stupid, or brainwashed that you believe you're doing the right thing by reporting someone for ignoring this kind of rule or by enforcing such rules?

This hits home for me. 

I grew up keeping animals "illegally". I am also very protective of my pets. If anything could push me over the edge to where I would "decisively neutralize" State scum, something like this could flip that switch in my head. It might not be smart, but it wouldn't be wrong.

Over the years I have known others who kept animals prohibited by the regional political criminals. It never once occurred to me to report them. Not even if there had been a monetary reward for doing so. Because I'm not an evil loser.

I oppose revenge and punishment, but I embrace consequences. I want every state employee involved in committing this archation to feel the consequences. Hard! I want the karen to feel the consequences just as agonizingly. I wouldn't be upset if they all starved to death in the cold because they lost their "jobs" and no one would ever hire them again, or sell them any food or energy. I wouldn't lift a finger to save them from the consequences of their actions. Or from any random event that just happened to befall them.

Am I angry? You better believe I am.

It's about a squirrel and raccoon, but it's really not. It's about the scum that works for the State and what they are willing to do to the innocent. If they'll do this over pets, they'll do it to you over guns, money, your children, or the food you eat. There's nothing they won't use as an excuse to sacrifice you to the god of the State. 

It's about the brainwashed supporters of the authoritarian State who say it’s “far-right” to acknowledge that the State goons violated a family by stealing and killing their pets. The sick statists who say they asked for it by breaking the “law”.

A bad joke?

If this stupid lie gets enough negative attention to help their favored politicians lose elections, good. They’ve earned it. As I say, this event has made me insanely mad. It feels like I was personally invaded and violated.

Consequences are coming. If not due to this, due to something else "minor" that will finally be the trigger. There's only one way to remove yourself from the consequences being set in motion for this hideously evil crime gang: Don't work for it. If you don't work for it, don't help it tyrannize others because then you are working for it, but as a slave. The lines are clear and I don't tolerate those who cross them.

-

Thank you for reading.
May I request your support?

Don't make government important to you

(My Eastern New Mexico News column for September 29, 2024)

Government has become too important in our daily lives. Not because it's actually important to our existence, but because it interferes with everything we do, and then threatens to hurt us if we resist its meddling.

A leaky roof or a crumbling foundation is important for the same reason.

I've had intoxicated acquaintances get in my face and hang all over me. I hated to be around them or to run into them. They were not a benefit to my life, but they made themselves important and hard to ignore because they were a problem.

I try to avoid contact with government and its representatives for exactly the same reason.

Yet, government is so much worse than any individual. Drunk friends don't imagine they have a right to be in your face or to control everything you do, 24 hours per day. Government representatives do.

I've seen lists of things-- things which violate no one in any way-- which were normal and legal one hundred years ago, but are now either illegal or licensed. "Licensed" means "illegal without paying government for the privilege of doing something you have a natural human right to do". It's a long list, and it's incomplete.

Government didn't suddenly get the right to forbid or ration these things; it stole these things from the people. From you. You've been robbed and probably didn't even realize it. We've become too complacent, and too willing to put up with it.

It's past time the people started taking these things back. It's time to reduce government's influence in our lives; to make it safe to ignore government's demands and the opinions of the political criminals who come together to form governments.

One way to free yourself is to realize a license from government is not the same as a credential. Credentials can be valid; a government license never is. If you learn a skill and get credentials from a trade group, saying you have earned their certification, I'm going to trust that you know what you're doing. A driver's license is proof that government licenses are meaningless where competence is concerned. It's merely a way for government to rob, control, and threaten you.

Don't ask government for permission, but don't ask it for help, either. Both make government important to you. Both erode your natural authority over your own life. This isn't something you want anyone to take from you.

-

Thank you for reading.
Show your support.

Random collection of thoughts

But not like the actor who portrayed Han.

-

Government is a violation of bodily autonomy.

-

Most websites are smugly Leftist. All their assumptions and starting points are far-Left, so their conclusions are predetermined. It diminishes their credibility. (I am unashamedly biased in favor of liberty.) Those which are Right-wing are just as ridiculous and frustrating, but I encounter so few of them that I don't get overloaded with their stupidity like I do with those on the Left (with the Right, it's generally individuals more than institutions). I grow to hate both (statist) sides more with each passing day. It makes me want to avoid being online- which is probably a good thing.

-

I wish there were a way to make the Democrat Party suffer for the past several years of lies, tyranny, manipulation, censorship, and targeting political opponents without rewarding the Republican Party for being stupid statists, too. The Libertarian Party isn't the solution I wish it were. The best move is still:

-

My respect for government and for those who work for government is at an all-time low. The longer I live-- the longer I have to put up with that nonsense-- the more the respect evaporates. It keeps dropping lower and lower. I can't lose respect for cops or politicians since I didn't have any to begin with. But the rest of them are part of the problem, too. Their existence contributes to the problem. Every day my willingness to accommodate them is less than the day before.

-

"Gender" is the wrong word when talking about living things.
Sex is binary.
Humans can't change sex.
If, in the future, it becomes possible for humans to change sex, I am completely enthusiastic about that medical advance. Go for it.

-

Mainstream programming loves to show guns as useless for defense. That’s called fiction.

-

Everyone thinks the presidential candidate they prefer-- at least among the DemoCRAPublicans-- is obviously going to win. You can probably tell which political criminal they prefer by which one they see as the inevitable winner.
I honestly have no prediction whatsoever. I can see it going either way. Neither outcome will surprise me. Nor would a resulting collapse afterward.

-

I don't want communism imposed on me.
I don't care if you form a communist enclave that lives peacefully with all its neighbors. Have at it. Just don't become a parasitic community stealing from those around you. Don't force your system on others. Let anyone who joins you opt out at any time if they decide your group isn't in their best interest. Get along with your neighbors and let them live as they see fit, too. In other words, don't make it political.
There's the rub.
I've never seen communists who can abide by this neighborly behavior. It's the same with all statism. Their "system" is so great they'll either force you to join or they'll kill you.
Politics makes ideas toxic.

-

Also, I’m insanely angry over the death of a squirrel. And at those responsible. This is where believing in government gets you.

-

Finally, any SHTF event I prepare for, such as whatever could happen in the next week or so after the election, never happens. Probably because I’m as ready for it as possible. So, if nothing major happens, you’re welcome.

-

Thank you for reading.
May I request your support?

You get a Gold Star!

The concept of a "Gold Star Family" is one of the most abominable examples of infantilizing I've ever seen. It's taken straight out of kindergarten class. Or preschool.

"Your child was sacrificed to the Aztec gods. Good job! Here's a gold star. Don't you feel special now?"

And, of course, most families accept it because doing otherwise would be admitting that your child was sacrificed to something as utterly useless and meaningless (and evil) as the obsolete Aztec gods no one believes in or worships anymore. 

They didn't die for freedom; they were sacrificed to empower tyranny.

I had never heard of the term until the past few years. I don't know when this idea was created, but it is both insulting and cruel. It's worse than a slap in the face.

Does this make the victims of government feel better about their status as victims of government? It really shouldn't.

-

Thank you for reading.
May I request your support?