I've seen a lot of people get really angry over Ross Ulbricht's pardon. Usually justified by "He was a drug dealer and people DIED!" Or, "Children were trafficked on his site!"
Prohibition is a powerfully addictive drug. Statists are highly susceptible to this addiction, and can't even see when it is destroying their ability to reason. They like prohibition. They demand prohibition. And they don't care who is killed for getting in the way.
Drug abuse is stupid; prohibition is evil.
The truth is, Ross allegedly ran a website that promised commerce with enhanced anonymity. Yes, people doing things prohibited by government are going to use such a site. So will those who recognize that government has no business looking into their business, regardless of how mainstream and ethical their business may be. Government is the enemy.
People try to justify Ross' caging by saying "He knew what would happen".
The CEO of Ford sells vehicles that he knows will be used in crimes. There's no question about it. They are designed to be very useful to criminals. Should he be locked up for two life sentences plus 40 years because of it? No, that's ridiculous.
Every CEO of any company that offers email or other electronic communication services, like cell phones, knows beyond a shadow of a doubt that those services will be used in the commission of crimes. People will be victimized by users of the service through the use of the service. Should those providers of valuable services be locked away and the key thrown into the ocean? No. Only someone evil would try.
And caging Ross was just as absurd. Freeing him was unambiguously right. If someone is on the other side, it's not "just an opinion" because someone's life was on the line; they are siding with evil in this case.
It's possible that other CEOs get a pass because they offer a backdoor for government criminals to access to violate their customers. Perhaps this was partly government's way of punishing Ross for not doing so.
The right thing to do, beyond freeing individual political prisoners, is to get rid of the illegal rules government uses as justification for taking them prisoner in the first place. This would obviously destroy government. I'm OK with that.
Show your support.
Those who are members of or supporters of political government rulership also know that it is an instrument of and committer of evil through coercion, theft and murder. Even more pertinent is that this system and venue for power and control over others was created with the knowing, willful and purposeful intent to do that evil. Nothing that this system does can be regarded as a necessary or useful ‘service’ that the voluntary cooperative actions of individuals in the private realm could not accomplish in a more effective, efficient and just manner.
ReplyDeleteAs you correctly note in the final paragraph above; the most parsimonious method to deal with the past and continuing evil of the State is not the application of an ad hoc clemency retroactively accorded to its particular victims but instead by the complete elimination of the perpetrating entity, entirely and permanently.
Yes, it's the willful decision to be evil rather than to be helpful.
Delete