Those who want you to doubt that anarchy (self-ownership and individual responsibility) is the best, most moral, and ethical way to live among others are asking you to accept that theft, aggression, superstition, and slavery are better.
KentForLiberty pages
- KentForLiberty- Home
- My Products for sale
- Zero Archation Principle
- Time's Up flag
- Real Liberty
- Libertarianism
- Counterfeit "laws"
- "Taxation"
- Guns
- Drugs
- National Borders
- My views
- Political Hierarchy
- Preparations
- Privacy & ID
- Sex
- Racism
- The War on Terror
- My Books
- Videos
- Liberty Dictionary
- The Covenant of Unanimous Consent
Thursday, January 04, 2018
Moving toward liberty
I am an absolutist and I'm also a gradualist.
Yes, really.
I know what liberty is, and nothing else will do.
But, as long as something is moving in that direction, I think it's sort of a good thing, even if it doesn't go far enough, fast enough.
But that doesn't mean I will ever take my eyes off the prize, or that I'm going to make excuses for the bits of slavery that are left. And I'm certainly never going to reject liberty as being "too extreme", in order to make people who fear it more comfortable. They are cowards or equivocators and they need to be ashamed.
For example, I am glad "concealed carry permits" are so popular, and have encouraged more people to be armed, but I'm not going to pretend concealed carry permits are a good thing, being a complete violation of the right to own and to carry weaponry without asking anyone's permission. "More armed people" is heading in the direction of liberty, but tying it to permits is unnecessary and harmful. So, will I advocate for more types of permits, or expanded permits? No. But will I scold people who have the permits? No.
I don't believe in Utopia. But I do believe in "better than what is", and that's where I want to go. There will still be problems. There will still be bad guys and people throwing their support behind bad guys. Not me, though.
People who are natural gradualists don't appreciate that I won't pretend a tiny improvement is enough. They'll never stop complaining that "the perfect is the enemy of the good" and settling for any tiny crumb-- or even moves in the wrong direction that feel right to them. Gradual is better than nothing, except when it is actually nothing.
Labels:
advice,
Counterfeit Laws,
DemoCRAPublicans,
Free speech,
future,
guns,
libertarian,
liberty,
Permits,
personal,
responsibility,
Rights,
society,
tyranny deniers
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
"I know what liberty is, and nothing else will do."
ReplyDelete...and I praise you for it.
I see it very similarly to you, although I tend to be more utilitarian in my thinking. Either it is correct or it is not. If correct, build/expand. If incorrect, correct, then build/expand.
Things like gun permits are incorrect. In order to correct it, you have to address the root issue of government; Human stupidity. And you can't fix stupid.
I see the patriotic gun toting 2nd amendment 'rights' crowd and want to kill them all. But I instead try to explain to them that there is no such thing as gun rights, that it is really about either defense or property. This usually results in being called a liberal followed by a long list of ignorant statements and fallacious premises, name calling, etc. thus further proving that you cannot fix stupid and that they indeed need to be exterminated.
Libertopia can work, even with a bunch of stupid people. But it has to be built from a clean slate. In other words; People are too stupid to correct, but not too stupid to learn the right way, mostly because it is what comes naturally in many respects.
Again, it comes down to genocide. It always comes down to genocide. That's the terms the state has produced as to make it necessary for correction.