...anytime you need to hit anyone in self defense, that's when. To imagine that someone gets a pass for aggression due to the type of genitalia they have is inconsistent and hurts everyone- attacker and victim, alike.
You are never obligated to defend yourself with violence, but on the other hand, you are also never obligated to sit back and take it. Not from anyone, ever.
I have never bought into this "never hit a woman" nonsense. Yet, I have refrained from hitting a woman a couple of times it was justified. Simply because I knew "the law" wouldn't have been on my side due to a total lack of witnesses. I'm not proud of that fact. There is nothing noble about allowing yourself to be hit while doing nothing to defend yourself.
When my second marriage was getting really bad, my (newly psychotic) wife would occasionally slap me and dare me to do something about it. I did- I got away. But I would have been right to have punched her, and am somewhat ashamed that I didn't. You and I both know I would have been arrested for defending myself, since her aggression happened in the privacy of our home. It doesn't matter, though. As the aggressor she deserved to be defended against with whatever amount of violence it took to stop the attack.
Refusing to hit her could also be seen as a form of self defense- defense against insane "laws" and bigotry. Choosing one violation to avoid a potentially worse one.
So, no, I have never hit a woman, but I will never condemn someone who hits an aggressor of any sex. Sometimes it is simply the right thing to do. If that offends you, well, suck it up, Buttercup.
Those who want you to doubt that anarchy (self-ownership and individual responsibility) is the best, most moral, and ethical way to live among others are asking you to accept that theft, aggression, superstition, and slavery are better.
KentForLiberty pages
- KentForLiberty- Home
- My Products for sale
- Zero Archation Principle
- Time's Up flag
- Real Liberty
- Libertarianism
- Counterfeit "laws"
- "Taxation"
- Guns
- Drugs
- National Borders
- My views
- Political Hierarchy
- Preparations
- Privacy & ID
- Sex
- Racism
- The War on Terror
- My Books
- Videos
- Liberty Dictionary
- The Covenant of Unanimous Consent
I disagree, not because your arguments are wrong (as far as they go) but because it is not a wise course of action. Getting away is better than escalating a fight in which the referees are highly biased (you WILL lose). Anyway a man should be able to take whatever a woman dishes out, unless she's armed with a gun or baseball bat...
ReplyDeleteNever said it was wise. In fact, I pointed out that was part of the reason I didn't defend myself. But to say "a man should be able to take whatever a woman dishes out" is equivalent to saying "a woman should be able to take whatever a man dishes out"- it is excusing the aggressor and putting the blame on the victim. I won't do that.
DeleteI'll agree with Paul. When all else fails, run!
ReplyDeleteWomen, police and rattlesnakes are not that difficult to avoid.
Sam
Running doesn't always work- I know.
DeleteI agree with Paul & Sam too, but I sure understand the desire to smash someone's face who has hurt me!
ReplyDeleteThat would be revenge, and isn't what I'm talking about. I'm talking of self defense.
Delete