Saying "You have no right to initiate force" is not the same as saying "Thou shalt not initiate force".
Sometimes I wonder if people get the distinction. Probably not, since most seem to have been programmed to see things only in terms of "Thou shalt not...".
If you feel you "must" initiate force to prevent what you believe to be a looming disaster (an obviously drunk/impaired driver, for example), then go ahead and do it with the full understanding that you are acting outside of what you have a right to do, and accept ALL the consequences, even if you feel they are not "fair".
And don't think it's OK to steal money to pay for others to do it on your behalf. It isn't. In fact, I think that's even worse than initiating force yourself. It just makes more people guilty.
.
Those who want you to doubt that anarchy (self-ownership and individual responsibility) is the best, most moral, and ethical way to live among others are asking you to accept that theft, aggression, superstition, and slavery are better.
KentForLiberty pages
- KentForLiberty- Home
- My Products for sale
- Zero Archation Principle
- Time's Up flag
- Real Liberty
- Libertarianism
- Counterfeit "laws"
- "Taxation"
- Guns
- Drugs
- National Borders
- My views
- Political Hierarchy
- Preparations
- Privacy & ID
- Sex
- Racism
- The War on Terror
- My Books
- Videos
- Liberty Dictionary
- The Covenant of Unanimous Consent
No comments:
Post a Comment