I was pointing out that Obamney 2.0 is no different from Obamney 1.0 by saying:
"If you are not happy about the turd sandwich you have been eating, flip it over and see if it tastes better. That's a bigger difference than the difference between Obamney 1.0 and Obamney 2.0." (I wish I could remember where I first read that because I love it!)
And I was told that if I can't say anything nice, don't say anything at all. Apparently the truth is not "nice". Too bad.
Then I was "educated" about how much Obamney 2.0 "truly loves America and wants it to be the great country it once was". How he is "change" and will "put our country back on track". (Where have I heard that before? Oh yeah...)
The other person in the conversation and I were told "we have to do what we can to get Obama [sic] out of office". Why? Replacing a crooked thug with a crooked thug doesn't accomplish anything.
Then, the most absurd claim of all: "...he believes in the Constitution, The Declaration of Independence, and the American people. With a foundation like that, I think he is heading in the right direction."
Ummmm... has the person not been paying attention to what Obamney 2.0 actually does? He might "believe in" those things, but only as a hyena "believes in" the baby gazelle he is eating. Every action Obamney 2.0 took as governor violated the Constitution and the intent and spirit of the Delaration of Independence. A tyrant who doesn't trust "the American people" with guns (and Obamney 2.0 is as venomously anti-gun as 1.0) doesn't "believe in" them. If his direction is "right" then so is his opponent's. But they are not heading in the right direction. After all, they both imposed ObamneyCare on their victims.
She says "If I'm wrong about Romney [sic]..shoot me". No. I know for a fact that she would oppose Obamney 2.0 with everything she has if there were a "conservative" candidate running; the only reason she supports this parasite is because she believes it's either him or the current clown. And she is so blinded by hatred for Obamney 1.0 that she'd be voting for a rotting groundhog (an improvement over the current candidates) if it were running as a Republican.
So, I will not shoot desperate Obamney 2.0 (or 1.0) supporters. And I won't try to educate them directly. But if they come to me, I will not be "nice" by lying to make them feel better about their delusions.
.
Those who want you to doubt that anarchy (self-ownership and individual responsibility) is the best, most moral, and ethical way to live among others are asking you to accept that theft, aggression, superstition, and slavery are better.
KentForLiberty pages
- KentForLiberty- Home
- My Products for sale
- Zero Archation Principle
- Time's Up flag
- Real Liberty
- Libertarianism
- Counterfeit "laws"
- "Taxation"
- Guns
- Drugs
- National Borders
- My views
- Political Hierarchy
- Preparations
- Privacy & ID
- Sex
- Racism
- The War on Terror
- My Books
- Videos
- Liberty Dictionary
- The Covenant of Unanimous Consent
I was recently told that Obamney 2.0 has "God on his side." No joke.
ReplyDeleteWell, then he'll win no matter whether anyone votes for him or not. And if he doesn't win...
ReplyDelete