Ft. Hood: convergence of tragedies
Now that a week has passed since the massacre at Ft. Hood I'll weigh in with my observations. It isn't shocking that I reach very different conclusions than do the blood-dancers of the Mass-Murderer Fan Club.
I'll leave out the obvious points about the drawback of having a government-owned military rather than a militia of free individuals. And the other obvious observations about what happens when you use that government-owned military to go around the world coercing and occupying regions where they don't want your brand of statism to replace their equally twisted brand of statism. No, I'll leave those things for other people who have more tact than I to point out and discuss.
I'll just point out some of what I noticed about the tragic events of that fateful day.
Notice that the government can't protect people even on military bases or in (other) prisons; two of its most tightly controlled areas. How could anyone possibly believe government could protect them anywhere else? Unless they are in denial, people can't believe it.
ANY religion, when taken too seriously, can cause death and destruction. Not in every instance obviously, but often enough it should be a warning sign to you of potential problems. If your religion encourages you to initiate force against "them", whoever " they" may be, it is wrong and disgusting. If you misinterpret your religion as telling you to do so, you are the one who has real problems.
"Gun free zones" are only "gun free" as long as bad guys don't want to kill people there. Once someone decides to start killing, those zones will have the worst possible number of guns- however many that bad guy has. Most bad guys, like this most recent one, are cowards and will find a place where they can pick off unarmed victims. Others, knowing they probably won't get out of it alive, choose to attack where they can get the highest body count before being stopped. Either way, they choose the same kind of place: anywhere good people are unlikely to be armed. Stay away from places like this if you can. Find a way to arm yourself anyway, with something, if you can't avoid them.
And, last, but possibly most critical: Bad people with guns can only be counted on to be stopped by other people with guns. Don't count on your awesome ninja skills to save you.
************************
Those who want you to doubt that anarchy (self-ownership and individual responsibility) is the best, most moral, and ethical way to live among others are asking you to accept that theft, aggression, superstition, and slavery are better.
KentForLiberty pages
- KentForLiberty- Home
- My Products for sale
- Zero Archation Principle
- Time's Up flag
- Real Liberty
- Libertarianism
- Counterfeit "laws"
- "Taxation"
- Guns
- Drugs
- National Borders
- My views
- Political Hierarchy
- Preparations
- Privacy & ID
- Sex
- Racism
- The War on Terror
- My Books
- Videos
- Liberty Dictionary
- The Covenant of Unanimous Consent
My gosh, this is not an issue about Guns or Gun Rights. This is an issue of Islamo-Fascism and Islamic Jihad against America.
ReplyDeleteThe fact that you completely ignored the issue at hand in your entire article, shows you to be a complete imbecile, or in cahoots and sympathetic for the decided anti-libertarian Jihadists.
Stupid and pathetic attempt at an article. Your biased writing frankly sucks.
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteYour comment is an example of the statist ("neocon", specifically) "jihad" against freedom.
ReplyDeleteThe anonymous comment I deleted was only a spam comment, not one critical of my opinions or intelligence. Just in case anyone wondered.
ReplyDeleteKent,
ReplyDeleteIf Eric Dondero doesn't like it, you must be doing something right. Eric do you take hyperventilate pills, or are you just naturally breathlessly credulous? why do you take the time, is what I wonder? I've yet to see a comment from you that is in any way insightful about anything...hell usually there isn't even a coherent thought evident, like now.