I had quite the disappointment the other day, even though I ought to know better.
A person whose blog I've enjoyed (occasionally) for a long time-- and who I had a positive opinion of-- had posted something on Twitter. I commented. I don't think it's the first time I've ever commented on one of their tweets, but I know I don't do it very often.
This time I posted what I meant to be a playful, good-natured response, and I got scolded, put down, and they tried to make me feel like an insignificant nobody. (I'm not going to refute the point, but who would do that to someone who had no ill-will?) I wasn't even doing what they accused me of doing, but had mistakenly thought they might be amused. Boy, was I wrong!
Not only that, but this person was saying what I did by commenting was stupid and then kept bragging in a couple of follow-up tweets about their social status and widely recognized huge vocabulary and writing skill. And then they misspelled something in one of their braggy Tweets. (Oops! Don't you hate when that happens?)
I understand that my comment was taken the wrong way. I guess I shouldn't have commented at all. Yet, it showed me what kind of person they are, and it wasn't what I was expecting. Maybe they were just in a bad mood, or maybe I really am that awful. It's why you probably shouldn't have heroes (and why I don't).
-
Writing to promote liberty is my job.
YOU get to decide if I get paid.
I hope I add something you find valuable enough to support.
Writing to promote liberty is my job.
YOU get to decide if I get paid.
I hope I add something you find valuable enough to support.
When I saw who it was, I said "oh, of course."
ReplyDeleteShe's a pretty good writer and an asset to the freedom movement.
She also goes ballistic at any hint of someone stepping out of line by indicating that they think they're even remotely her equal in any field or might know something she didn't.
I have a favorable bias toward Kent, respect his point of view and believe his motives to be honorable, but I'm just a random out of the loop internet commenter guy.
ReplyDeleteI will admit this spat has my inner drama voyeur sense tingling. Alas, the trail is not well marked though, thus hard to commiserate.
Don't tease me bro! More identity clues please. Chuckle.
Thomas Knapp figured it out all on his own. So, apparently, sufficient clues are there. LOL.
DeleteI don't intend to focus a light on her for what I see as personal unpleasantness-- especially since she didn't ask to be burdened with my attention.