I love to be made to think. Or, maybe, led to think. I don't do well with being forced to do anything, even things I enjoy.
This is why I don't mind hearing people who disagree with me-- in some way I haven't yet considered-- laying out their thinking. It always makes me think-- sometimes for weeks. I may not come to agree with their point of view, but at least I'll have spent time considering something I hadn't considered before. How is that not fun?
But that's what's so disappointing about most statist arguments.
They are old, tired retreads. Reruns that weren't that entertaining the first time around, and are excruciatingly dreary now.
They don't make me think because they are things I thought through (and dismissed) long ago. There's nothing new there to make me think. No new points; no new twists. They don't make the effort to present something new, probably because there's nothing new to present.
The statist arguments haven't changed since the first lazy looters settled down to loot a population under the lie of "government". Statists still make the same claims that were made the first time some thug came up with the idea which we now call political "authority". It was wrong then; it's wrong and boring now.
No comments:
Post a Comment