Government is an unnecessary evil (my chosen headline)
Of all the crazy ideas humans have come up with over the centuries, one of the most destructive is the idea that government-- or more accurately, the State-- is necessary.
What gives people this idea? What makes them believe that without the State society would collapse?
The twelve-plus years of indoctrination by employees of this organization, beginning in early childhood, to view it as something other than a criminal gang plays a part. Due to this schooling most can no longer see the truth behind the curtain, and will defend government's existence at every opportunity.
Few understand what the State is, or what it does. The State is an institution established to commit theft and aggression over a particular area. Of course, they call the theft "taxation", eminent domain, asset forfeiture, property codes, licensing laws, fines, and so forth, and call the aggression "law enforcement", "compulsory attendance", "arrest", and checkpoints.
The State is not the same as society, but is its worst enemy, with opposing goals and methods. Instead of using the "economic means", where both parties win, the State employs the "political means", where one party wins at the expense of another. Roadside peddlers use the economic means; muggers use the political means.
Lacking this basic understanding, the people support theft and aggression as long as it is "legally" committed by government employees.
Some believe this protects them from bad guys.
A big problem is that the bad guys who want to violate life, liberty, and property without facing the natural consequences of doing so are drawn to government jobs where they get a free pass. Or nearly so.
Maybe some believe that without the state, grand projects could never be completed. One of the most common expressions of this fear is "But who would build the roads?" Well, obviously, the same people who build them now. But financed voluntarily, by people who can be held accountable if poor design, shoddy workmanship, or faulty maintenance causes bodily harm or property damage. Try suing the state over icy roads, or the pothole which never gets properly repaired, resulting in property damage, and see how accountable the state is for the roads it claims to own.
If something is wanted or needed, someone will find a way to provide it, and someone will be willing to help finance it. Guaranteed. You don't need something as anti-social as the State to provide good things to the individuals who make up society.
-
A big "thank you!" to those of you who support this blog, with your visits, shares, or money. If you get any value from my writing, consider a subscription or a one-time donation to keep this blog going. If you believe I have contributed anything to the conversation regarding liberty during the ten years this blog has existed, and believe I have more to contribute, help me keep writing without the added difficulty of having a boss to offend..
But....but.....but...."WE are the government!".........
ReplyDeleteThere's that most useful lie. ;)
DeleteKent,
ReplyDeleteFine article and of course I agree with your conclusion. You asked where the concept came from. I believe it started when, in our early history, natural leaders stepped forward in times of need, invasion or some other reason, to direct or organize. This concept has transferred to believing "government" or "controllers" provide the same service, a concept which has proved to those aware, to be erroneous.
Tahn
I always suspected it was roving bandits who got smart and lazy and decided to settle down and "tax" a population continually rather than to go to all the trouble of riding in to plunder and risk getting killed a couple times a year.
DeleteWhy can't it be both? LOL
A great resource for answering this question is "The Rise and Decline of the State" by Martin Van Creveld.
Delete