"Net neutrality" isn't neutral. It is pro-State in the extreme. Pro-tyranny.
It is to internet access what Soylent Green is to food. I guess that makes Soylent Green "Food Neutrality".
Yeah, no thank you. I don't want some bureaucrat or puppetician's ideas of "net neutrality" screwing up the internet and making it less of a threat to their plans.
Keep your filthy State- and its legal excrement- off the internet and all forms of communication.
.
Those who want you to doubt that anarchy (self-ownership and individual responsibility) is the best, most moral, and ethical way to live among others are asking you to accept that theft, aggression, superstition, and slavery are better.
KentForLiberty pages
- KentForLiberty- Home
- My Products for sale
- Zero Archation Principle
- Time's Up flag
- Real Liberty
- Libertarianism
- Counterfeit "laws"
- "Taxation"
- Guns
- Drugs
- National Borders
- My views
- Political Hierarchy
- Preparations
- Privacy & ID
- Sex
- Racism
- The War on Terror
- My Books
- Videos
- Liberty Dictionary
- The Covenant of Unanimous Consent
The problem with any "political" answer is that the winners take all.
ReplyDeleteMarkets create variety, something for everyone. Just because one person gets what they want doesn't stop anyone else from getting what _they_ want.
Real "net neutrality" would be to leave the market alone. Even my personal opinion about how to run it (which I happen to think is pretty damned good) is wrong to force on everyone.
Yep. One size never fits all.
Delete