I just saw on the news that "The White House" says Edward Snowden should be returned to the US where he can be given a "fair trial". (Like Bernard von NotHaus?)
Let's skip right past the part where a building is speaking, and focus on the part where a criminal's spokespuppet is insisting that the person who pointed out the criminal acts of the criminal is the one who is to be given a "fair trial". What Snowden did wasn't wrong, can't therefore be really "illegal", and for the criminal to be offering Snowden a "fair trial" is absurd.
I guess that next, burglars will be offering to sell back stolen goods for a "fair price", and rapists can give their victims a chance to give consent after the attack. And if the victims refuse, then we can all throw stones at them.
If anyone should be offered a "fair trial" it is those whose evil acts were exposed by Snowden. The thugs have it backwards yet again.
Then, I also saw John McCain emitting rancid verbal flatulence about how what Snowden had done was "a slap in the face of the USA". Good! The "USA" is the anti-America, and it's thugs, scam artists, crooks, and spies should face consequences for the acts of evil they have been committing with stolen "tax dollars". A slap in the face is too good for them.
Yeah, I have a problem with anyone making an oath to a group of thugs to begin with, but some people have to start there.
-And please don't forget.
.
Maybe the O-man can get a 'fair trial' for inciting racist mobs to violence against peaceful people.
ReplyDeleteThat would be too good to be true...
No, he'll probably get a prize (like the Nobel Prize for Peace) - oh, he already got that.
But 'rancid verbal flatulence' certainly should be actionable... No?
War 'hero', peace prize recipient - cut from the same cloth. Who knew?
Bizarro world.
Rich