Saturday, March 08, 2008

"Anarchists" vs Government

I see that government is blaming "anarchists" for a bombing. Yawn. If government knew its place, and stayed there, "anarchists" wouldn't go to the trouble of bombing. As a strategy, bombings don't work well. Government sympathizers become more determined and stronger in their defense of the indefensible when their temples are bombed. Just as any religion does.

Plus, government uses bombings as an excuse to tighten the screws of tyranny even more. If the government extremists really wanted to end threats against their establishments, they could. Rein in the excessive government and the anti-excessive-government forces will wither away for lack of difference. It is a simple law of nature, like a pendulum. The further it swings in the tyranny direction, the further it will necessarily swing in the anti-tyranny direction. The more extreme the government faction becomes, the more extreme its opposition becomes. Anarchy is the middle ground where neither is needed or welcome.

In this case, though, I am suspicious. I suspect that this may just be another "Reichstag fire".

3 comments:

  1. People killed by Anarchists: A couple worthless presidents, a few other people.

    People killed by the State: Do I even need to make a list?

    ReplyDelete
  2. One big problem is that .gov lumps nihilists and garden variety revolutionaries, as well as the mentally challenged in with anarchists. All of the "anarchists" throwing bombs in support of communism weren't bloody anarchists, just statists of a different stripe.

    However, as long as nihilists etc... are considered to be anarchists people sympathetic to anarchy have trouble defining their beliefs. Which works in the state's favor.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Which is a big reason I don't accept most of the government's definitions. They don't have a clue about the truth... in ANY area.

    ReplyDelete