And then, like magic, suddenly everyone is mad about taxes.
Welcome to the party, Pal.
Tips are nice.
Those who want you to doubt that anarchy (self-ownership and individual responsibility) is the best, most moral, and ethical way to live among others are asking you to accept that theft, aggression, superstition, and slavery are better.
Welcome to the party, Pal.
It’s not "gun culture" that’s the problem. It’s crime "culture".
I’m part of gun culture. We don’t shoot people because they disrespected us. We don’t point guns at our friends because we “know” the guns aren’t loaded. We don't shoot at houses as we drive down the street. We don't mug people at gunpoint. Or with a knife held to their throat.
Those who do those things are not part of gun culture.
That chief cop parroted a Leftist propaganda phrase because he’s an evil loser, too, just like the rest of them.
He’s trying to avoid blaming crime culture by blaming gun culture. Like protects like. He should be sued for defamation. What a nasty anti-gun bigot!
(I'm also writing my newspaper column for next week about this.)
I know the Supreme Court exists to find excuses that allow unconstitutional legislation and policies to stand.
We are not the same.
And, no. One team isn't better on this than the other. Both are disgusting in their desire to violate the liberty they don't like.
(Grok wouldn't follow my directions to accurately portray actual current Supreme Courtjesters. In fact, it tried to give me only white men in the image. I prefer to ridicule the actual bufoons as they are. Oh well.)
It doesn't matter what letters come with your bureau or agency; you're a domestic enemy. Just like the US federal government is an enemy of America- although I consider the US government more of a foreign occupation force.
It doesn't matter what else your businesses do; you're an enemy of liberty.
Maybe you even do some good. Great! Now stop doing evil. Stop helping government commit its evil acts.
Helping government- especially helping it spy on or control the individuals- is unhelpful in the extreme.
Here's a sampling of what Dictionary.com says of "Corruption":
The act of corrupting or state of being corrupt. Antonyms: purity, honesty...
Moral perversion; depravity. Synonyms: immorality, dissolution.
Perversion of integrity.
Corrupt or dishonest proceedings.
Bribery putrefactive decay; rottenness. Synonyms: contamination, pollution, foulness, putrescence, putrefaction, rot...
Any corrupting influence or agency.
This is a perfect description of how political government is designed to work. Government as normal. You can't distinguish between government and "corruption" except in your fantasies.
Part of that design is to employ fraud. So, the fraud isn't evidence of corruption, just of government being what government is. The fraud is still fraud.
How does Dictionary.com describe "Fraud"?:
Deceit, trickery, sharp practice, or breach of confidence, perpetrated for profit or to gain some unfair or dishonest advantage.
A particular instance of such deceit or trickery.
Any deception, trickery, or humbug.
Guilty of dishonest practices, as bribery; Lacking integrity
This is what government does. How it functions. This is on top of the supposed "corruption" that is what government is.
However, if you want to claim "It's not fraud; it's how government operates", I'm not going to argue with you. Either way, society would be better off if we stopped tolerating it.
I'm excited about this because it means I can shoot inside the house. It's hard to find a nearby place to shoot firearms, so this will help a little.
I've always wanted a Schofield, but they are pricey. This is a good substitute, and it is a lot of fun to shoot. Yes, I've been shooting it already.
I have a very old Daisy SAA-type BB gun. It's extremely weak, and the BBs come out sort of randomly (when they come out at all). You can suggest a general direction by aiming, but it will still decide whether or not to take your suggestion. This Barra is more accurate and quite a bit more powerful. It's higher quality all-around and feels solid in my hand.
I also love the system they use, where you put a BB into the tip of a fake cartridge, then load that into the gun. It gives you more of a feeling of shooting for real. I'm going to get more of the cartridges for faster reloads. I suppose I'll need to get more CO2 cartridges, too.
I am using a cardboard box full of sheets of cardboard as my backstop. It's about 6.5" thick, and the BBs make it about 4" through the layers. The shots don't even disturb the cats. I don't shoot if cats are in the room with me, though.
If you want a quality airgun, made of metal, for some shooting fun, I can recommend the Barra Schofield.
And, no, they aren't paying me for saying this (or even aware of me at all). It's just my opinion, presented to you as something you might like.
No one said anything political/stupid in my presence. One person tried to show me his "personal text" from Trump, and I said, "That's nice", and moved on to other matters.
Other than the screaming children, it was peaceful. Screaming children are more bearable than political talk from statists, after all.
Someone asked me about Bitcoin, and I told them what I know. Someone else asked me about silver, and one person asked me about (their own) gun. Again, I answered questions, but nothing got political. It was just fun conversation.
Political criminals really don't have much sway over our day-to-day lives. At least, not nearly as much as they'd like us to think they do. They want us to think about them and worry about what they might do next. They want us to wonder whether we have their permission to do this or that.
But, for the most part, you can just live your life.
This doesn't mean you'll always be right, but it means you'll be less likely to fall for harmful propaganda.
Anything which is (or is made) political is probably wrong. If you mix politics with anything, you destroy everything but the politics. You are left with politics and nothing else. There may be a kernel of truth in there somewhere, but you need to find it before you act. Especially if doing what you're told gives government more power in some way- you won't get it back.
I know there are those who value acting now over analyzing the situation. They are free to do what they think is best.
I know, too, there are times you have to jump if someone yells "Tiger!"
Those times are less common than the fearmongers would have you believe. I have rarely regretted hesitating before doing what government (or "they") demanded I do immediately. At the moment, I can't think of even one time I regretted it. Often, I ended up not doing it at all, much to my future peace of mind. Unlike what the cartoon above claims, it often takes much longer than 6 months, but I can be patient.
As has been said, today's conspiracy theories often become tomorrow's "Well, yeah, that was true, but..." Then it's "history" instead of a conspiracy theory.
No.
I already know this, so I don't ask for data. If it is offered, I'm probably not going to pay attention to it or change my mind because of it.
The problem is that I don't believe data when it is mixed with politics. Two reasons. Remember, Politics makes people stupid, AND politics destroys anything it gets mixed with. Data is not immune.
Even if authoritarianism "works", it is unethical. So that's a hard "no" for me. Data that justifies slavery is meaningless to me.
In fact, since X screwed up their setting where "For you" is the default instead of "Following", it's the only thing I see until I switch back to "Following".
Admittedly, that may be a function of the Al Gore Rhythm feeding me things that will get me to engage, rather than a true reflection of percentages. But I know it makes me feel like "They" ARE coming to take my guns. Or, "they" are encouraging armed government goons and other political criminals to take my guns, since few have the guts to do so in person. This radicalizes me a bit.
Of course, a lot of the most vocal anti-gun bigots are in other countries. Others are professional activists against your liberty, no matter the specific topic. So, zero credibility, but loads of very loud opinion.
These nasties frequently demand data to show that they are wrong, but they pre-reject any data they are presented with. It never changes.
In fact, I had been in a discussion with one for a couple of days, and she kept demanding I show her the data that would prove she was wrong, and trying to taunt me with made-up quotes of me expressing my inability to do so.
I finally posted this outside that conversation, as a setup:
If someone won't show you the data you demand, it's not because it doesn't exist, it's because no one is going to do your work for you only to have you say, "That doesn't count". Anti-gun bigots- I'm looking at YOU. And you *know* that's what you do every time.Then, I gave her a link to an X account (associated with John R. Lott, Jr.) that does nothing but present exactly the kind of data she'd been demanding all along. And I waited.
I liked some of Reiner's movies; most I haven't seen. I can enjoy movies, but I am NOT a "film guy". If you're trying to be clever or artsy with your movie, I'm probably not impressed. If your film has a message other than "Liberty!", ditto. If the movie is entertaining and enjoyable and isn't hitting me over the head with a dumb, forced message, I would probably like it, even if I haven't seen it.
Any murder is tragic.
I also don't care even a little what Trump said about him after he died. At least, he didn't celebrate. If someone had spent the past decade publicly hating you as an individual (and possibly even working with the Deep State to imprison you), you have every reason to not care what happens to him.
I feel as though Rob Reiner wasted the last decade of his life on TDS, but this doesn't mean he "deserved" his fate. He didn't. No one does.
Take "gun rights" people, for example.
Too many of them are fine with other natural human rights being violated- as long as it doesn't affect them. You'll find many of them who support prohibition, "immigration" control, or cops. The number of them who are flaming statists astounds and disappoints me.
A lot of them even approve of background checks, the NFA, and government keeping "certain people" from exercising their right to own and carry weapons. I guess, as long as they have theirs, it doesn't bother them too much if government violates the rights of others.
Gun stores may be the worst offenders, since I suspect many of them like the fact that government is protecting their market share by regulating the crap out of guns, in clear defiance of the Constitution. I think it's some sort of "teacher's pet" power trip. They feel special, since they have a "license"... never mind it's for something no one can rightfully require a license for.
It's not any better with other liberty-oriented topics. Most people love what they love, but everyone else is out of luck. No support.
I do my best to surround myself- at least online- with people who do better. I'm happy to report that it works.
Your right to practice your religion can't include a "right" to violate others. Not even if your religion requires it.
No one has the right to murder people over religion. Not because you believe your religion encourages or requires it, or because you don't like their religion.
If your religion actually does require or encourage you to kill people over religion, your religion is disease-spreading sewage oozing across the planet.
No one has the right to murder others, or to violate their life, liberty, or property in any way. Rights don't work like that. If your religion tells you otherwise, your religion is wrong.
You might still be a good person, but it's in spite of your religion, not because of it.
And, if you imagine I'm singling out any one group, you'd be mistaken.