Those who want you to doubt that anarchy (self-ownership and individual responsibility) is the best, most moral, and ethical way to live among others are asking you to accept that theft, aggression, superstition, and slavery are better.
KentForLiberty pages
- KentForLiberty- Home
- My Products for sale
- Zero Archation Principle
- Time's Up flag
- Real Liberty
- Libertarianism
- Counterfeit "laws"
- "Taxation"
- Guns
- Drugs
- National Borders
- My views
- Political Hierarchy
- Preparations
- Privacy & ID
- Sex
- Racism
- The War on Terror
- My Books
- Videos
- Liberty Dictionary
- The Covenant of Unanimous Consent
Saturday, January 12, 2019
Partial "knowledge" and flawed motives
On many topics, the reason people want to "know more" is so they'll have an "informed opinion" they can try to get government to follow.
People want to know if AGCC is "real" so they can know in which direction to ask government to act.
People want to be "informed" about the issue of a "border" wall so they can know which way to push government to act.
People want to know how much "gun crime" [sic] would be prevented with anti-gun "laws" so they can advocate accordingly.
I don't have that problem, because I know theft and aggression are wrong, and that no matter how I feel about something it is wrong of me to ask government to do anything about it. Additional "knowledge", contaminated by a political agenda, can't change that.
_______________
Reminder: I could really use some help.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)