Someone was arguing against liberty, using every justification for political government she could think of (probably with the help of years of statist indoctrination).
She kept having every objection shot down by everyone she was engaging with. So, having lost the debate, she played the "race" card:
“Others” will be able to choose who they help. “Others” always choose to help the people they think deserve help, which won’t be people who are not white. So I’m not name calling, I’m calling it out. And I’m not interested in asinine alternate perspectives, thanks.
This is a standard statist perspective- both the assumed racism of others and admitting a disinterest in "alternate perspectives".
I have never once used "race" as a deciding factor for whether or not I'd help someone. Not once. Even when I easily could have. This is beyond the comprehension of those indoctrinated into statism. They assume "race" matters as much to others as it apparently does to them.
It's not the first time I've run across this-- I remember old "academic" Robert Lindsay, before he got shot down and deleted his entire blog after claiming libertarianism is racist and throwing a hissy-fit when presented with evidence that he was wrong.
It shouldn't be shocking that government supremacists are bigoted in other ways as well.
Me? I don't care about anything but whether you're going to archate. Anything else is insignificant. I don't care who you are, I care what you do. And statists archate, by definition.
-
Please support the Tobbles Memorial Project on Patreon
