The thing is, I think a self-defensive voter needs to make very clear that the voting is only done to try to avoid difficulties later by either "legalizing" liberty, or by rejecting a "legalized" restriction on liberty, but that if the results of the election go against liberty the voter has no intention of going along with the result.
There is NO consent. Liberty is NOT subject to a vote!
I still think it's better to laugh at the whole silly rigged game.
*
