You may not have noticed- especially since I had a couple of entries already set to post- but I was in the hospital for a few days. It was unexpected. So, no Clovis News Journal column this week.
I have a few things almost ready to publish, so I may not miss more days, but give me a little while to get back up to speed.
It began with a trip to the emergency room at about 3:30 am Monday, after a couple hours of writhing on the floor. It was nothing too serious- just a kidney stone (4mm x 6mm), and it actually is still there. More doc visits in the coming days.
If I seem a little out of it in my posts (or comments or replies) for a few days I'll blame the pain meds.
.
Those who want you to doubt that anarchy (self-ownership and individual responsibility) is the best, most moral, and ethical way to live among others are asking you to accept that theft, aggression, superstition, and slavery are better.
KentForLiberty pages
- KentForLiberty- Home
- My Products for sale
- Zero Archation Principle
- Time's Up flag
- Real Liberty
- Libertarianism
- Counterfeit "laws"
- "Taxation"
- Guns
- Drugs
- National Borders
- My views
- Political Hierarchy
- Preparations
- Privacy & ID
- Sex
- Racism
- The War on Terror
- My Books
- Videos
- Liberty Dictionary
- The Covenant of Unanimous Consent
Thursday, February 19, 2015
"Right to control" a powerful delusion
"Right to control" a powerful delusion
(My Clovis News Journal column for January 16, 2015)
Almost all areas of political contention are invented and imaginary. Those areas of life shouldn't be subjected to laws, majority opinion, or anyone's control.
There are only two things subject to control: aggression and violations of private property. Those don't need any response beyond self defense. No one needs to give you permission to protect yourself and your property, and no one can take away your right to self defense.
Beyond that, just look at all the areas which have been perverted by politics:
There is no such thing as "illegal immigration"- there is only trespassing on private property or not, and where a person was born or what government papers they hold has no bearing on the matter.
There is no right to tell others what they can ingest, inject, smoke, buy or sell- and that includes the size of soft drinks or the fat content of food.
There is no right for the State to ration or regulate marriage. The State can record the marriage if the participants want, but there its involvement must end.
There is no right to forbid the ownership or carrying of weapons, what weapons someone chooses to carry, where they carry them with property owner permission, nor how those weapons are carried.
There is no right to control how someone uses their own property, nor whether they run a business.
There is no right to force people to buy any product or service, such as health insurance.
There is no right to require permits or licenses, nor to charge the associated fees.
Where there is no right, no authority can exist. You can't delegate authority for something you have no right to do as an individual.
There is not even any such thing as taxation- there is either respect for private property, or the opposite: theft. There is no right to be provided things, services, or a salary financed by taking money from others.
To pretend you- or some imaginary "we"- have the right to dictate to others how they can live their lives is the source of the vast majority of political strife. To pretend the authority exists to decide what percentage of other people's property can be taken for "the common good" causes almost all the rest.
It's a powerful delusion, perpetuated through most of recorded history, over most of the planet's populated surface. It's still wrong.
There is almost nothing in life legitimately subject to a vote or any other form of imposed control. Anytime a vote is taken, unless you allow the losing side to opt out- without penalty- your vote is a sham. Imposing the results is aggression or theft and makes you the problem.
.
(My Clovis News Journal column for January 16, 2015)
Almost all areas of political contention are invented and imaginary. Those areas of life shouldn't be subjected to laws, majority opinion, or anyone's control.
There are only two things subject to control: aggression and violations of private property. Those don't need any response beyond self defense. No one needs to give you permission to protect yourself and your property, and no one can take away your right to self defense.
Beyond that, just look at all the areas which have been perverted by politics:
There is no such thing as "illegal immigration"- there is only trespassing on private property or not, and where a person was born or what government papers they hold has no bearing on the matter.
There is no right to tell others what they can ingest, inject, smoke, buy or sell- and that includes the size of soft drinks or the fat content of food.
There is no right for the State to ration or regulate marriage. The State can record the marriage if the participants want, but there its involvement must end.
There is no right to forbid the ownership or carrying of weapons, what weapons someone chooses to carry, where they carry them with property owner permission, nor how those weapons are carried.
There is no right to control how someone uses their own property, nor whether they run a business.
There is no right to force people to buy any product or service, such as health insurance.
There is no right to require permits or licenses, nor to charge the associated fees.
Where there is no right, no authority can exist. You can't delegate authority for something you have no right to do as an individual.
There is not even any such thing as taxation- there is either respect for private property, or the opposite: theft. There is no right to be provided things, services, or a salary financed by taking money from others.
To pretend you- or some imaginary "we"- have the right to dictate to others how they can live their lives is the source of the vast majority of political strife. To pretend the authority exists to decide what percentage of other people's property can be taken for "the common good" causes almost all the rest.
It's a powerful delusion, perpetuated through most of recorded history, over most of the planet's populated surface. It's still wrong.
There is almost nothing in life legitimately subject to a vote or any other form of imposed control. Anytime a vote is taken, unless you allow the losing side to opt out- without penalty- your vote is a sham. Imposing the results is aggression or theft and makes you the problem.
.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)