"Violence"- when I use the word I am referring to the ethically neutral use of physical force, typically targeted against an individual or individuals.
As opposed to aggression, which is the use of violence against a person who isn't currently violating life, liberty, or property, nor credibly threatening to do so. Aggression is the initiation of force (or the initiation of violence).
Self-defense or defense of property can be violent but isn't aggressive since the other party "started it" by initiating force or violating property rights.
Violence can be good or bad; aggression is something you have no right to commit. Aggression is a facet of archation.
Thursday, April 26, 2018
"Pacifism"
It's strange how people misrepresent the meaning of words when it suits their purpose.
Such as "pacifism". It doesn't mean what some people wish it meant.
It isn't "pacifism" to oppose aggression. You can even oppose aggression violently. In fact, sometimes that's the only way you can oppose it effectively.
I oppose aggression in all its forms. I am not a pacifist. The very thought sickens me. I've known people who said they were pacifists, and if that's what they want I'm not going to insist they change. But pacifism seems like a rejection of responsibility. If you won't fight to protect yourself or others from archation, it seems like you are helping the bad guys.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)