To decide whether a gun “law” is or is not Constitutional is a very simple, two-step process.
- Is the “law”, rule, or policy made up by, or enforced in any way by, employees/cronies of government?
- If so, does the rule apply to weapons in any way?
If so, it is unconstitutional.
That’s it. There is nothing more to consider.
It doesn’t matter if the Supreme Court tries to complicate the matter or is scared to do the right thing. If they decide in any other way, using any other criteria, they are wrong. Since they probably know better, they are lying.
Why do they try so hard to confuse the issue? Because they are crooked.
This is why you never trust your rights to anyone affiliated with any government. Never!
But it doesn't matter to the big picture: No one has the right to disarm anyone who isn't a current credible threat or committing archation. Such a right doesn't exist and can't be created. The natural human right to own and to carry weapons isn't subject to the opinions and wishes of politicians, and can't be eliminated by ignoring or abolishing any part of any document.
