I oppose war.
I support the natural human right of defense.
If a government military is involved, it's not defense. Same thing if a quasi-government-like military is involved.
If your forces are going into other people's towns, neighborhoods, and homes, to kill them and destroy things, you are not a good guy. You are doing things you don't have a right to do. The residents there have the fundamental human right to kill you in the act, no matter how evil they might otherwise be in other situations.
I get that you may be doing this in response to others doing things they had no right to do. Two wrongs don't make a right. It looks more like revenge-- "punishment"-- and I consider revenge to always be wrong (even though I totally understand the drive).
I'm no pacifist. Not even close. If you're familiar with this blog, you already know that.
There's an ethical way to respond to archators-- see the above about the natural human right of defense.
I know this opinion is about as popular as a scared, leaky skunk in an elevator. If opposing war gets me "canceled", it's worth it.
