I have a few things to add related to my recent post about Scott Adams' mistake about "climate change" not being a "power grab".
You and I know it is.
Scott would say this just shows you are pretending to read their minds. Plus you would be assuming they don't actually believe AGCC is the apocalyptic crisis they claim it is.
My counter to that is that since we can't actually read minds, what we have to do is infer what someone is thinking by their actions. Even if they actually believe AGCC is a life and death crisis, they are choosing the path which gives government more power.
There are paths to solving "climate change", if it needs to be solved, which don't give government additional power. Paths using economic means rather than political means. Why are they not promoting those paths?
You could imagine they don't know those other paths exist. Yet, they do exist and they aren't hard to find or come up with on your own unless you can't imagine solutions which don't involve government. Theft and coercion shouldn't be your default. If they are, there's something wrong with you. Probably what's wrong with you involves at least a bit of power lust, and hoping that the new system will put you a little higher in the power hierarchy.
_______________
Reminder: I could really use some help.
"Why are they not promoting those paths?"
ReplyDeleteExactly.
It's because it's really about control, and because pursuing peaceful means would further expose the bullshit.
Don't waste your time trying to convince people. They'll never get it and will always pursue a means to violate you with govern-god.
The fix is to kill everyone. The reasoning is simple; Dead people don't ______.