If someone is shooting at you, it's not your responsibility or obligation to figure out why they are shooting, or who they are- you just need to shoot back. Killing them is a good thing. Unless you are the one trespassing or stealing. But you wouldn't be doing that, would you?
Anyone wanting to prevent that by "law" or in any other way is NOT a friend of life, liberty, or the pursuit of happiness. They are a murderous monster. Treat them as such.
.
Those who want you to doubt that anarchy (self-ownership and individual responsibility) is the best, most moral, and ethical way to live among others are asking you to accept that theft, aggression, superstition, and slavery are better.
KentForLiberty pages
- KentForLiberty- Home
- My Products for sale
- Zero Archation Principle
- Time's Up flag
- Real Liberty
- Libertarianism
- Counterfeit "laws"
- "Taxation"
- Guns
- Drugs
- National Borders
- My views
- Political Hierarchy
- Preparations
- Privacy & ID
- Sex
- Racism
- The War on Terror
- My Books
- Videos
- Liberty Dictionary
- The Covenant of Unanimous Consent
Saturday, May 11, 2013
"Who are you? Why are you shooting at me?"
Labels:
advice,
guns,
liberty,
murder by cop,
Property Rights,
responsibility,
Rights,
society,
terrorism
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Rational people might _think_ that would be a no-brainer. Sadly, in New Hampshire, idiot legislators (but I repeat myself) are trying to repeal 'stand your ground' in favor of 'be faster than a speeding bullet' despite the inconvenient facts that the even the bill's sponsor can't cite a single case of 'stand your ground' being abused, and that a Nashua man successfully invoked 'stand your ground' after the police charged _him_ for brandishing a firearm to defend himself and a wounded friend from a violent mob.
ReplyDeleteIn Indiana, their Supreme Court ruled that c/i/t/i/z/e/n/s/ serfs have no right to defend themselves from illegal assaults by police (because your next of kin can sue after you're dead and somehow bring you back to life, apparently), sparking 'no-brainer' legislation to the contrary... which police unions naturally tried to fight.
What, there ar no time outs?
ReplyDelete