Hearing someone refer to politicians as "leaders" is like fingernails clawing at a chalkboard. It grates on my nerves.
I have written about why this description is wrong in the past. Some people who agree they are not leaders still balk at calling them what they actually are: rulers. I've never seen a reasonable objection to this characterization, but perhaps there is one out there somewhere.
Still, they are not, and never have been, leaders. Unless you follow them.
If you are dumb enough to allow yourself to be led by a politician you shouldn't complain about where it leads you.
-
Writing to promote liberty is my job.
YOU get to decide if I get paid.
I hope I add something you find valuable enough to support.
Writing to promote liberty is my job.
YOU get to decide if I get paid.
I hope I add something you find valuable enough to support.