Those who want you to doubt that anarchy (self-ownership and individual responsibility) is the best, most moral, and ethical way to live among others are asking you to accept that theft, aggression, superstition, and slavery are better.
KentForLiberty pages
▼
Sunday, February 03, 2019
Benefit of the doubt
When I say socialists/statists are stupid, it is my attempt to give them the benefit of the doubt. The unpleasant alternative, which I'm trying to avoid, is that they are evil. I believe evil is worse than being stupid.
Once they've decided it's OK to allow government to commit a "little bit" of theft or aggression (archation) on their behalf-- and if they're not stupid-- they've willingly chosen evil.
Why they did so-- fear, "culture", pragmatism, complications of statism, whatever-- doesn't figure in.
If I believe they are smart and yet they continue to advocate socialism/statism, stupidity is no longer an excuse. That option has been taken off the table. So what is left?
I want to give everyone the benefit of the doubt, but they make it hard and don't appreciate it anyway.
_______________
Reminder: I could really use some help.
Doublethink is like decaffeinated cognitive dissonance.
ReplyDeleteMany "normal" people haven't even gotten to the cognitive dissonance part yet and to twist a Thoreauism are perpetually "swatting at the branches". I'd substitute your term stupid with ignorance, although I feel your pain and sometimes have thought of them as stupid too.
What brings me down to earth is the realization that I once stood among the ignorant and didn't question things as much as I do now. Sure am glad there's people like you who can articulate concepts well, don't get discouraged. Rome wasn't destroyed in a day.
I don't want to think of them as stupid. But ignorance only works until they've been shown how and why they are wrong.
DeleteBack when I was statist in many areas, the evidence that I was wrong helped me change my mind. Not immediately, but fast enough that I immediately stopped espousing the statist mantra while I considered the new evidence.
But what I see most often is that in the face of evidence, they get louder and more determined. I'm not sure how to write that off as ignorance-- although it would be nicer of me to do so.
(And I realize I have lost a LOT of readers over the years due to my near-inability to excuse statism-- I've seen what they've written about me in comments on other, more "conservative"/statist blogs. So it's probably not a good thing for me, personally.)
Delete