I want you to be safe. I hope you don't do things to endanger yourself and others, and I want you prepared-- everywhere you go-- in case someone else means you harm.
In the past couple of weeks there have been at least two cases of some loser deciding to murder people who were harming no one. I will not boost the fame of these murderers by using their names; calling them losers is clear and accurate.
In one case, the loser chose his victims based on a delusion that their religious group was responsible for killing his people. It's a common type of delusion, but most people don't decide to murder because of their hallucinations.
In the more recent attack, the loser said, in social media posts he made around the time of his murders, that he was bored and didn't understand why mass shootings kept happening.
Mass murders happen when losers like him make the choice to murder people. It's not hard to figure out. And if your cure for boredom is to murder twelve people, you are evil.
Misguided people will blame the losers' guns, but you know what was missing, don't you? Guns in the hands of the right people; not identifiable security guards, who are easy targets. Widespread concealed carry is critical to your safety.
If something happens in your presence, you are the first responder. No one else is. The moment a crisis begins, no one else is in a better position to defend your life and the lives of those around you. Any law which makes it harder for you to do so is making the problem worse.
These murderous losers make me angry, but I get just as angry when political activists start clamoring for more anti-gun laws which can only guarantee the success of these losers.
There's no safety in hiding behind laws. Losers with murderous intent will not be stopped by laws-- even if you could magically make every gun vanish. Look at other parts of the world where similar losers choose knives, bombs, or cars for mass murder. You might as well make it illegal for the Sun to zap the Earth with X-rays; people intent on murder will pay just as much attention. Each situation is different, as is each loser's motivation, but other than trapping everyone in their own padded cell, there is no way to solve this with laws. The best cure is a commitment to defense.
An excellent article! Several years ago, I did some independent research. I looked at random "mass" shootings (where the individual victims were not specifically targeted AND the shooter did not stop on their own). I discovered that shootings stopped by police averaged 10-12 deaths, shootings stopped by unarmed civilians averaged 2-3 deaths, and shootings stopped by armed civilians averaged 1-3 deaths. I encourage people to do their own research. The data shows that having a civilian stop the shooting saves almost 10 lives per event. I'm pretty sure that having a gun would increase the odds of a civilian fighting back. If it saves just one life, shouldn't the politicians be all for it?
ReplyDeleteThey should... but that's unthinkable for them.
Delete(And cops are "civilians" too, even if they don't believe they are. LOL.)
Deletewhen seconds count,
ReplyDeletethe costumes are minutes away.
and, if someone is unwilling to accept the responsibility of protecting their own life and their loved ones (by carrying), then they have chosen.
Liberty is like that.
They are minutes away, and when they do show up they're as likely to murder you as help you.
Delete