(Previously posted to Patreon)
The fake "crime" of "resisting arrest" is in the news because of the Don of Police in NYC wanting to make it a "felony" rather than a lesser "offense".
This is just one example why I don't want "laws" forbidding "felons" from owning guns. Too many silly "laws" have been dreamed up to make completely ethical acts "felonies".
Resisting arrest is your right. Even if you actually did something wrong. Nothing can change that.
The reality is that "resisting arrest" is usually used against people the molesting cop KNOWS didn't actually do anything wrong, to have an excuse to punish him anyway. To show him he should have simply complied with the evil (and illegal) demands of the cop.
Copsuckers normally claim you should just allow yourself to be kidnapped, and then sort it all out in court. That's as stupid as saying you should allow yourself to be raped and then take the rapist to court- a court run by rapists just like him, who are members of the same gang as your rapist.
You have an absolute human right to resist a kidnapping- even if it is called "arrest". You have the absolute human right to kill your kidnapper if he doesn't stop his attempt.
I admit, once the cop decides to molest you, you have lost. You are not coming out undamaged. No one can tell you how to act at that point. You have to decide for yourself whether you want to put yourself under the power of someone you know is a dangerous threat, so he can deliver you to his gang, or whether you want to get it over with and die on your feet while resisting his molestation.
Either way, I will remember that the cop is the true bad guy- the enemy of Rightful Liberty- even if you are also at fault.
.
Those who want you to doubt that anarchy (self-ownership and individual responsibility) is the best, most moral, and ethical way to live among others are asking you to accept that theft, aggression, superstition, and slavery are better.
KentForLiberty pages
▼
Monday, February 09, 2015
Is "society" a real thing?
I believe it is, but maybe not the way the term is often used.
I see "society" as a useful term for describing a large system made up of the aggregate action of many interacting, individual parts. An emergent property.
Sort of the way "weather" is. Or "The market".
If a raindrop hits you, you might not say it is "raining" if that was the only drop. And, even if it is raining, not every potential raindrop will fall.
A "society" isn't guilty just because one individual is guilty. If "everyone" is guilty, you can still find individuals who are not.
It's why I still use the word "society" in some contexts. It doesn't replace individuals, but it can describe the general weather. The "system" that results from the actions of each individual part.
.
I see "society" as a useful term for describing a large system made up of the aggregate action of many interacting, individual parts. An emergent property.
Sort of the way "weather" is. Or "The market".
If a raindrop hits you, you might not say it is "raining" if that was the only drop. And, even if it is raining, not every potential raindrop will fall.
A "society" isn't guilty just because one individual is guilty. If "everyone" is guilty, you can still find individuals who are not.
It's why I still use the word "society" in some contexts. It doesn't replace individuals, but it can describe the general weather. The "system" that results from the actions of each individual part.
.