Anytime one goes out in public, and many times when you think you are safe in your own home, you are in danger of being victimized by a criminal.
Many people (many more than gun-haters know) take responsibility for their own safety and the safety of the public at large, by carrying a weapon. The chance of being victimized on any particular day is very small. Of course, it does happen without warning and you should always be prepared.
On the other hand, the chance of being stopped and victimized by a cop who is willing to enforce victim disarmament laws, having your weapon discovered, and being arrested or killed grows larger each and every day that those counterfeit "laws" stay "on the books".
You can avoid that danger by abdicating your responsibility and walking around unarmed.
Or you can beg permission from the "government" to be allowed to carry a weapon. Subject to their whims, restrictions, fees, and inclusion in criminal databases, of course.
Either of these options robs you of your humanity in a real way, since it is an admission that you belong to the state. Unfortunately, the danger from cops is probably getting greater than the danger of being victimized by freelance criminals. It makes the decision more difficult.
Who is a bigger danger: freelance criminals or cops? I wish I had the answer.
.
The answer is simply "cops." In my opinion, "outlaw cops" is a repetitive phrase. I've never been victimized by a freelance criminal, but I've been harassed by state criminals numerous times, and I have to worry about them every time I leave the house. They're all over the streets.
ReplyDeleteI am afraid you are correct. My question is, then, is it better to carry or not, knowing that your greatest danger comes from cops? If you defend yourself against them, you are committing suicide in almost every case.
ReplyDelete